GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Agorapulse · September 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Agorapulse

80Judge labels
11First choices
19Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Social media for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 59 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 36 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Agorapulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Social media managementMarketing15%3 of 590%36accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%60 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
PR and media monitoringMarketing0%61 of 65100%1under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 24%
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing0%76 of 1370%1under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agorapulse yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agorapulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini20002
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast31105
Mistral Small11103
DeepSeek V4 Flash14005
Llama 4 Maverick02204
Qwen 3.7 Flash02013
Kimi K213004
GLM 4.7 FlashX10203
MiniMax M2.503104

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels1
Paraphrase15 labels7
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels3
Negative19 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lowest Risk Scores (7/100) - Consider these instead: Agorapulse - Clean record, agency-friendly” Mistral Small · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer alternatives (low risk scores ~7/100, clean records): Agorapulse, SocialPilot” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Agorapulse as the top social media scheduling and monitoring tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the two strongest well-rounded fits are Sprout Social and Agorapulse” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why to avoid for PR monitoring: No News Clipping” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agorapulse, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agorapulse was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Hootsuite68 of 804Not in the top three
Sendible30 of 802Not in the top three
Metricool29 of 801Not in the top three
Sprinklr26 of 803Not in the top three
SocialPilot24 of 803Not in the top three
Later23 of 800Not in the top three
Vista Social20 of 803Not in the top three
Zoho Social19 of 801Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agorapulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 80 answers that named Agorapulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sproutsocial.com5
zapier.com4
buffer.com3
hootsuite.com3
napoleoncat.com3
planable.io3
agorapulse.comYour site2
blog.hootsuite.com2
blog.hubspot.com2
dashsocial.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Agorapulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agorapulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agorapulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agorapulse.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack