| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media management | Marketing | 15% | 3 of 59 | 0% | 36 | accepted challenger |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 60 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15% |
| PR and media monitoring | Marketing | 0% | 61 of 65 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 24% |
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 0% | 76 of 137 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Lowest Risk Scores (7/100) - Consider these instead: Agorapulse - Clean record, agency-friendly” Mistral Small · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer alternatives (low risk scores ~7/100, clean records): Agorapulse, SocialPilot” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Agorapulse as the top social media scheduling and monitoring tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the two strongest well-rounded fits are Sprout Social and Agorapulse” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why to avoid for PR monitoring: No News Clipping” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 80 answers that named Agorapulse and are not a share of its labels.
Twenty-seven of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Agorapulse came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agorapulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agorapulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agorapulse.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.