Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 37
2 categories · RankedAgorapulse
85Judge labels
6First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Social media for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 53 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 39 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Agorapulse →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business4 of 38
6%32 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 53
6%39 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise53 of 55
0%12 labels
criticized challenger
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Agorapulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media management | Marketing | 6% | 5 of 53 | 5% | 39 | accepted challenger | ▼−11Since September 2026: 15% → 5%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Employee advocacy platforms | Marketing | 0% | 47 of 64 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by DSMN8 at 21% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Agorapulse held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Social media · by segment
Mid-market▼−11Since September 2026: 15% → 5%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 51
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 51 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media | 15% | 5% | ▼−11Since September 2026: 15% → 5%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 5 of 53 |
| Employee advocacy | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 64, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Agorapulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Agorapulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase14 labels4
Comparative21 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labelsNone
Negative14 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“platforms like Agorapulse, Sendible, or later-stage reviews of Sprout Social tend to have fewer issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer alternatives: Tools like Agorapulse or Sprout Social often rank higher for support and reliability” Grok 4.20 · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“My default recommendation: Agorapulse Professional for a mid-sized B2B team” GPT-6 Luna · Social media · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“frequently cited as offering better value with fewer hidden costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Minor concerns: Occasional reports of slow or unhelpful customer support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
“$79/user/month (annual) | Engagement-focused (less budget-friendly)” Grok 4.20 · Social media · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agorapulse, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agorapulse was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Agorapulse, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agorapulse was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agorapulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 79 of the 85 answers that named Agorapulse and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
buffer.com60
agorapulse.comYour site38
blog.hootsuite.com35
blog.hubspot.com33
napoleoncat.com26
learn.g2.com25
make.com24
socialrails.com24
sproutsocial.com22
zapier.com22
271 of the 309 domain citations in answers naming Agorapulse came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
agorapulse.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Agorapulse takes 6% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
agorapulse.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Agorapulse takes 6% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“agorapulse”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 35 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 73,939 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 11,834 · 919 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,698
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 53 in social media
Segment leader
30%
Sprout Social
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 85 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 79 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on agorapulse.com
3,404
subdomains included
Content
1,695
counted in the table below
Documentation
187
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,001 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 283 | 0 | 2025-08-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 174 | 0 | 2025-12-04 | ||
| Case study | 105 | 0 | 2024-11-23 | ||
| Comparison | 51 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 31 | 0 | 2023-10-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | 0 | 2023-05-04 | ||
| News or press | 16 | 0 | 2023-08-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 1 | 2026-09-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28E7 blog
- 2026-09-25Build the ai teammate that catches your mistakes before they publish blog
- 2026-09-25Best ai tools for social media blog
- 2026-09-2310184307 how to view a published or failed post glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-21E6 blog
- 2026-09-18Ai can write the sentence it cant write the memory blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page agorapulse.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Agorapulse
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Agorapulse; a claim can dispute any of them.
AgoraPulse 1Agorapulse Professional 1
Follow Agorapulse
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Agorapulse is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Agorapulse is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Social Media Management Software
- For
- businesses of all sizes, social media managers, digital marketers, and agencies
- Price stated
- Free for 30 days - No card required agorapulse.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free for 30 days - No card required agorapulse.com
- Integrations claimed
- 6 agorapulse.com
- Customers named
- OgilvyDigital ButterKlikEverscaleOneStreet ResidentialCollaborative Drug DiscoveryThe Purposeful Culture GroupLovepop
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What Agorapulse's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: agorapulse.com, trust.agorapulse.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agorapulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agorapulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Agorapulse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Agorapulse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Agorapulse, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.