Every category where a model named SocialPilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	2%	8 of 59	9%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SocialPilot yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SocialPilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	1	1	6
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels5

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SocialPilot is a user-friendly platform designed for budget-conscious buyers... best for small to mid-sized businesses and social media managers seeking an affordable platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Social media · budget prompt · first choice

“Safer alternatives (low risk scores ~7/100, clean records): Agorapulse, SocialPilot” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · negative prompt · first choice

“Budget pick for agencies/multi-clients; unlimited users on higher tiers. Lighter on monitoring depth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Agency managing many clients \u2192 Sprout Social or SocialPilot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“14-day trial only | $30/month (10 accounts) ... No free tier” Grok 4.1 Fast · Social media · budget prompt · soft negative

“Cons: Lighter monitoring features, dated interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SocialPilot, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialPilot was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Buffer46 of 5418Not in the top three

Hootsuite41 of 545Not in the top three

Sprout Social37 of 548Not in the top three

Later27 of 540Not in the top three

Agorapulse24 of 545Not in the top three

Sendible24 of 540Not in the top three

Metricool22 of 543Not in the top three

Sprinklr20 of 543Not in the top three

Zoho Social20 of 541Not in the top three

Vista Social15 of 543Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialPilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 54 answers that named SocialPilot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

buffer.com4

sprinklr.com4

zapier.com4

blog.hubspot.com3

efficient.app3

learn.g2.com3

napoleoncat.com3

posteverywhere.ai3

postiv.ai3

blog.hootsuite.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming SocialPilot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

buffer.com/resources/best-social-media-management-tools4

sprinklr.com/blog/social-media-management-tools4

zapier.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools4

efficient.app/best/social-media-management3

napoleoncat.com/blog/social-media-management-tools3

posteverywhere.ai/blog/best-social-media-management-tools3

postiv.ai/blog/social-media-management-software-for-small-business3

blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialPilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialPilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialpilot.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.