Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 20 of 86, unchanged
3 categories · RankedSocialPilot
58Judge labels
5First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Social media for small business buyers
Rank 23 of 92 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SocialPilot →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market23 of 92
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SocialPilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 2% | 23 of 92 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 8 of 53 | 9% | 23 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 146 of 155 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% |
Movement
Since September 2026, SocialPilot held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 of 53, unchanged |
| Reviews | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 92, unchanged |
| Audience insights | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 146 of 155, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SocialPilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SocialPilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative15 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the tightest budgets, WiserReview and SocialPilot typically offer the best value proposition” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice
“frequently cited as offering better value with fewer hidden costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · first choice
“Other options include SocialPilot, which offers transparent flat pricing ... considered a good value for mid-market B2B companies” Llama 4 Maverick · Social media · direct prompt · alternative
“SocialPilot punches above its price point, offering a wide feature set ... at a fraction of the cost of enterprise tools.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Social media · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“like Hootsuite or SocialPilot can be fine for reporting, but ... not suitable when you need deep attribution or advanced audience intelligence” Perplexity Sonar · Audience insights · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mixed reviews with strong scheduling features but recurring complaints about reliability and customer support” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some credible complaints about bugs increasing after updates ... though reviews are mixed.” Grok 4.20 · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SocialPilot, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialPilot was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SocialPilot, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialPilot was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialPilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named SocialPilot and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
buffer.com38
blog.hubspot.com28
learn.g2.com23
blog.hootsuite.com22
g2.com17
socialpilot.coYour site17
make.com16
napoleoncat.com16
zapier.com15
agorapulse.com14
189 of the 206 domain citations in answers naming SocialPilot came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
socialpilot.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SocialPilot takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
socialpilot.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SocialPilot takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 6,600 a month (“socialpilot”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 43 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 93,623 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 28,741 · 423 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,649
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 220 clicks and $3,149 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 23 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 58 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on socialpilot.co
2,898
subdomains included
Content
756
counted in the table below
Documentation
208
Product · Integration
14 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 424 | 32 | 2026-09-28 | Social media, SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 108 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Comparison | 93 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 42 | 0 | 2026-05-07 | ||
| Podcast or video | 39 | 0 | 2024-01-07 | SEO | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 23 | 0 | 2025-07-07 | ||
| News or press | 13 | 0 | 2025-07-17 | Social media | |
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2024-01-31 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-11-14 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-11-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Pinterest statistics blog
- 2026-09-28Moz local alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-28Later pricing blog
- 2026-09-24New linkedin features and updates blog
- 2026-09-24Top social media influencers blog
- 2026-09-23Nap consistency blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page socialpilot.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SocialPilot
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SocialPilot is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SocialPilot is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Social Media Management and Scheduling Tool
- For
- agencies and brands
- Price stated
- 30.00–200.00 USD socialpilot.co
- Starting price
- 30.00 socialpilot.co
- Free plan or trial
- Start Your Free Trial; No CC Required; Cancel Anytime socialpilot.co
- Customers named
- DAS42PennyWilliamsWriterCahaba Medical CareGreenphireLife in DüsseldorfBirdhouse Marketing & DesignRed Ball ConsultantsThe Click Town
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What SocialPilot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: socialpilot.co, socialpilot.co/plans, socialpilot.co/features/ai-pilot, socialpilot.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialPilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialPilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SocialPilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SocialPilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SocialPilot, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.