Every category where a model named Vista Social for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	0%	14 of 59	0%	10	accepted challenger
Review and reputation management	Marketing	0%	77 of 103	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vista Social yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vista Social across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative21 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labels4

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best value with enterprise features | Vista Social, Agorapulse” Kimi K2 · Social media · scale prompt · alternative

“Offers a modern interface with strong AI assistance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

“Another budget-friendly option is Vista Social” Perplexity Sonar · Social media · budget prompt · alternative

“Vista Social — Budget-conscious small teams” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vista Social, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vista Social was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sprout Social38 of 434Not in the top three

Hootsuite36 of 434Not in the top three

Buffer30 of 4310Not in the top three

Metricool21 of 431Not in the top three

Agorapulse20 of 432Not in the top three

Later19 of 430Not in the top three

Sprinklr17 of 437Not in the top three

Sendible17 of 430Not in the top three

SocialPilot15 of 432Not in the top three

Zoho Social13 of 430Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vista Social. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 43 answers that named Vista Social and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

buffer.com3

efficient.app3

guideflow.com3

learn.g2.com3

napoleoncat.com3

planable.io3

zapier.com3

blog.hubspot.com2

busyworth.com2

crowdspring.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Vista Social came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

buffer.com/resources/best-social-media-management-tools3

efficient.app/best/social-media-management3

napoleoncat.com/blog/social-media-management-tools3

zapier.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools3

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/best-social-media-management-tools2

busyworth.com/compare/best-social-media-management-tools2

crowdspring.com/blog/best-social-media-tools-for-small-business2

embedsocial.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vista Social's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vista Social, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vistasocial.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.