GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Loomly · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Loomly

14Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Loomly was named 3 times in Social media, where Sprout Social led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 46

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 59

under the label threshold

Enterprise45 of 50

under the label threshold

In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Loomly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	0%	17 of 59	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Loomly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Loomly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Loomly or Planable, but pair them with a dedicated monitoring tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“generally had the cleanest records (lowest complaint counts)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · alternative

“Loomly - Instagram-focused with clean record” Mistral Small · Social media · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Loomly, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loomly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Buffer12 of 144Not in the top three

Hootsuite11 of 140Not in the top three

Sprout Social10 of 141Not in the top three

Sprinklr8 of 143Not in the top three

Agorapulse8 of 142Not in the top three

Later8 of 140Not in the top three

Sendible8 of 140Not in the top three

SocialPilot8 of 140Not in the top three

Metricool5 of 141Not in the top three

Zoho Social5 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loomly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 14 answers that named Loomly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com2

napoleoncat.com2

planable.io2

posteverywhere.ai2

postiv.ai2

socialbee.com2

zapier.com2

adwave.com1

backlinko.com1

buffer.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Loomly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

postiv.ai/blog/social-media-management-software-for-small-business2

zapier.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools2

adwave.com/resources/best-social-media-scheduling-tools-for-small-business1

backlinko.com/best-social-media-management-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/best-social-media-management-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/social-media-scheduler1

buffer.com/resources/best-social-media-management-tools1

busyworth.com/compare/best-social-media-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loomly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loomly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at loomly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.