Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 20 of 120
3 categories · RankedPlanable
34Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Content marketing for small business buyers
Rank 30 of 135 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 126
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market30 of 135
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 122
2%1 label
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Planable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 30 of 135 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 16 of 53 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 30% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 80 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Planable held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 28 of 134
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 16 of 53 |
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 30 of 135 |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 80 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Planable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Planable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For mid-sized agency collaboration & client approvals: Look at Planable or Sendible.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · negative prompt · alternative
“5. Planable - Strong for collaboration and approval workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Close Alternatives ... Planable | Collaborative reviews/approvals” Grok 4.20 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“4. Planable (Best for collaboration and approvals)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Planable, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Planable was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Planable, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Planable was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Planable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 34 answers that named Planable and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
planable.ioYour site21
blog.hubspot.com16
buffer.com14
postiv.ai10
distribb.io9
storychief.io9
thecmo.com9
trysight.ai9
clickup.com8
g2.com8
Ninety-two of the 113 domain citations in answers naming Planable came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
planable.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Planable takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
planable.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Planable takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“planable”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 59 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 69,879 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,770 · 657 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,837
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 30 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 34 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 34 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on planable.io
650
subdomains included
Content
434
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 318 | 40 | 2026-09-23 | Social media, SEO | |
| Comparison | 58 | 17 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Report or ebook | 36 | 6 | 2026-09-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 0 | 2025-07-03 | ||
| Case study | 7 | 0 | 2025-10-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-26 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Ai brand monitoring blog
- 2026-09-23Social media monitoring blog
- 2026-09-22Sprout social alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-2112 best social media scheduling tools for 2026 blog
- 2026-09-18Content calendar tools blog
- 2026-09-17Socialpilot alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page planable.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Planable
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Planable is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Planable is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- collaboration-first social media management tool
- For
- agencies, freelancers, and marketing teams
- Price stated
- Pricing planable.io
- Starting price
- 33 planable.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free planable.io
- Integrations claimed
- 2 planable.io/integrations
- Certifications
- GDPR compliant2-factor authentication
- Customers named
- Creative LabelSavvySMEElectric Kite MediaOneFinePlayArboxYan Pierre le LuyerDavid Christopher PhotographyMorisson Marketing
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Planable's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: planable.io, planable.io/pricing, planable.io/product, planable.io/customers, planable.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Planable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Planable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Planable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Planable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Planable, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.