Every category where a model named StoryChief for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	7%	5 of 159	0%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for StoryChief yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated StoryChief across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative17 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“StoryChief ⭐ Top Pick ... Go with StoryChief for the best balance of content planning, creation, SEO, and multi-channel publishing” Kimi K2 · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Overall for Pricing & Transparency ... Choose StoryChief if you want transparent pricing and proven AI integration.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Content marketing · comparative prompt · first choice

“If your main struggle is creating content once and distributing it everywhere, StoryChief is highly recommended.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“The Best All-in-One Content Platform: StoryChief” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as StoryChief, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StoryChief was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HubSpot Content Hub34 of 4215Not in the top three

CoSchedule28 of 425Not in the top three

Semrush21 of 421Not in the top three

Contently19 of 420Not in the top three

Jasper12 of 420Not in the top three

Buffer11 of 420Not in the top three

Notion11 of 420Not in the top three

Ahrefs9 of 420Not in the top three

Asana8 of 420Not in the top three

Surfer SEO8 of 420Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named StoryChief. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 42 answers that named StoryChief and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

storychief.ioYour site3

aigrowthagent.co2

blog.hubspot.com2

gartner.com2

omnibound.ai2

postiv.ai2

socialbee.com2

thecmo.com2

asana.com1

contentgrip.com1

Sixteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming StoryChief came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.hubspot.com/website/content-marketing-platform2

gartner.com/reviews/market/content-marketing-platforms2

omnibound.ai/blog/content-marketing-tools2

postiv.ai/blog/content-marketing-automation-tools2

storychief.io/blog/content-marketing-platform2

aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-ai-content-marketing-platforms1

aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-content-calendar-software-20261

aigrowthagent.co/articles/best-content-marketing-platforms-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when StoryChief's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as StoryChief, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at storychief.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.