Every category where a model named Jasper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI marketing agents	Marketing	4%	3 of 157	12%	26	accepted challenger
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	2%	18 of 135	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data enrichment	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	47 of 50	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
SEO and content optimization platforms	Marketing	0%	57 of 78	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jasper yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jasper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	0	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	0	2	5
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	3	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels2

Paraphrase28 labels7

Comparative36 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained16 labels2

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative112 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick to established tools like HubSpot AI, Jasper, or Google Analytics AI—less "agentic" hype, more proven.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI marketing agents · negative prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Jasper AI as the top AI agent for creating marketing content and campaigns.” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“### 1. Jasper AI (Best for Brand Consistency & Content)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“Jasper \u2013 Best overall for B2B marketing teams” Mistral Small · Content marketing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Jasper at $59–69/month if you're strictly budget-conscious (Rytr offers similar for less)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI marketing agents · budget prompt · hard negative

“Examples: Jasper (with no human review), Writesonic, Rytr, basic ChatGPT wrappers. ... Never publish raw AI output without significant human editing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SEO · negative prompt · soft negative

“One founder spent $30,000 in a month on an "AI marketing team" (Jasper, HubSpot, Canva, ChatGPT Enterprise)” Kimi K2 · AI marketing agents · negative prompt · soft negative

“repeatedly get flagged on G2/Reddit for "generic, repetitive, surface-level output" unless heavily trained” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jasper, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jasper was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Copy.ai35 of 1120Compare →

HubSpot Content Hub22 of 11212Not among the top eight

HubSpot Breeze22 of 11210Compare →

StoryChief19 of 1125Not among the top eight

Semrush Content Marketing Platform17 of 1120Not among the top eight

ChatGPT14 of 1124Compare →

Albert.ai14 of 1123Not among the top eight

Salesforce Agentforce14 of 1123Not among the top eight

Buffer14 of 1121Not among the top eight

Contently14 of 1121Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jasper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 105 of the 112 answers that named Jasper and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com53

fueler.io32

thecmo.com31

folk.app27

factors.ai24

jasper.aiYour site24

trysight.ai23

hubspot.com21

linkedin.com21

flowhunt.io17

249 of the 273 domain citations in answers naming Jasper came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

folk.app/articles/best-marketing-ai-agents27

fueler.io/blog/top-ai-agents-for-automating-marketing-campaigns18

blog.hubspot.com/website/content-marketing-platform17

flowhunt.io/blog/best-ai-marketing-agents17

startupstash.com/top-ai-marketing-agents16

trysight.ai/blog/best-content-marketing-platforms16

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/content-marketing-tools14

supermetrics.com/blog/ai-agents-for-marketing14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

jasper.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Jasper takes 4% of first choices and HubSpot Breeze takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 165,000 a month (“jasper”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 46,711 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 115,679 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,599 · 551 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 34,853
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

22 ads · 22 text · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as JASPER AI, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 3 of 157 in AI marketing agents

Segment leader

24%

HubSpot Breeze

First choices: 11 across its categories
Named in: 112 answers
Its own site cited: in 105 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on jasper.ai

856

subdomains included

Content

505

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

22 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	379	undated		SEO, ABM
Webinar or virtual event	50	2	2026-09-10	SEO, ABM
Report or ebook	34	7	2026-09-10	SEO
Case study	18	0	2025-06-11	SEO
Conference or event	7	undated
Podcast or video	7	0	2024-01-25
News or press	4	0	2024-01-25
Glossary or explainer	3	undated
Comparison	2	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-10Why marketers need agents to win ai search webinar or virtual event
2026-09-10Transparent object removal report or ebook
2026-09-09Shadow generation report or ebook
2026-09-08Background removal in design tools report or ebook
2026-09-07Text to image from scratch report or ebook
2026-09-03Gartner flex report report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page jasper.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Jasper

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jasper; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jasper AI 5Jasper (AI Content Platform) 1Jasper / Copy.ai 1Jasper / Jigsaw 1Jasper AI (with Campaign Manager) 1

Follow Jasper

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Jasper is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The execution platform for intelligent marketing.
jasper.ai
For: modern marketing teams
jasper.ai
Price stated: Pricing jasper.ai
Starting price: 59 jasper.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free trial available jasper.ai
Integrations claimed: 1000 jasper.ai/platform
Certifications: SOC 2SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPAPCIDPASOC 2 CertifiedGDPR Compliant
Hosting: US-based data centers
Customers named: Cushman & WakefieldAdidasWayfairSentinelOneIHeartMediaBMC SoftwareEmeraldXBonterra

What Jasper's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: jasper.ai, jasper.ai/pricing, jasper.ai/trust, jasper.ai/platform, jasper.ai/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jasper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jasper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Jasper by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Jasper is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Jasper, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Jasper is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Jasper is among the products AI models recommend first in AI marketing agents this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-marketing-agents/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/jasper--ai-marketing-agents-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI marketing agents, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI marketing agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-marketing-agents/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/jasper--ai-marketing-agents-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI marketing agents, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI marketing agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/ai-marketing-agents/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/jasper--ai-marketing-agents-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in AI marketing agents, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the AI marketing agents standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.