Every category where a model named Albert.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI marketing agents	Marketing	0%	49 of 157	40%	10	criticized challenger
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	0%	96 of 113	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 13%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Albert.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Albert.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative10 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Albert.ai is the most clearly positioned for autonomous paid media management.” Perplexity Sonar · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“### 1. Albert.ai Best for: Autonomous paid media optimization” Kimi K2 · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“Automate paid ads entirely | Albert.ai, Sweep” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice

“For Paid Ad Management: Albert AI - Autonomous digital marketing platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI marketing agents · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Things to Avoid on a Tight Budget - Albert.ai or Smartly.io — Enterprise-level autonomous agents that cost $4,000–5,000+/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI marketing agents · budget prompt · hard negative

“Independent round-ups note it as a high-risk bet for most teams... The infamously overhyped Albert AI fares worst in practice” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI marketing agents · negative prompt · hard negative

“Black-box decisions | Limited transparency... High cost structure” Kimi K2 · AI marketing agents · negative prompt · soft negative

“"Opaque black-box model" gives no way to audit decisions” MiniMax M2.5 · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Albert.ai, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Albert.ai was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Jasper14 of 253Not among the top eight

Copy.ai10 of 250Not among the top eight

Google Ads4 of 252Not among the top eight

HubSpot Breeze4 of 252Not among the top eight

HubSpot Marketing Hub4 of 251Not among the top eight

Adext AI4 of 250Not among the top eight

Marin Software4 of 250Not among the top eight

Skai4 of 250Not among the top eight

Smartly4 of 250Not among the top eight

Meta Ads3 of 251Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Albert.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Albert.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fueler.io16

folk.app9

startupstash.com9

enrichlabs.ai8

adlibrary.com7

factors.ai7

superscale.ai7

blog.hubspot.com6

clickup.com6

flowhunt.io6

Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Albert.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

folk.app/articles/best-marketing-ai-agents9

fueler.io/blog/top-ai-marketing-agents-automating-campaigns9

startupstash.com/top-ai-marketing-agents9

enrichlabs.ai/ai-marketing-agent7

clickup.com/blog/ai-agents-for-marketing6

flowhunt.io/blog/best-ai-marketing-agents6

fueler.io/blog/top-ai-agents-for-automating-marketing-campaigns6

superscale.ai/compare/the-best-ai-marketing-agents6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

albert.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Albert.ai takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Breeze takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“albert.ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 13,642 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 125 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,239
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 49 of 157 in AI marketing agents

Segment leader

24%

HubSpot Breeze

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 25 answers
Its own site cited: in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on albert.ai

128

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	73	0	2025-06-30
Glossary or explainer	1	undated
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2025-06-30Bleeding budget across channels albert ai knows where to cut blog
2025-06-0106 blog
2025-03-17Beyond automation how ai helps marketers make smarter decisions in paid media blog
2025-03-0103 blog
2025-02-19Companies are claiming to be albert ai for job searches what you need to know blog
2025-02-0102 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page albert.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Albert.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Albert.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.

Albert AI 6

Follow Albert.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Albert.ai is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Artificial Intelligence Marketing Platform
albert.ai
For: Marketers
albert.ai
Price stated: Contact us for a customized pricing plan. albert.ai/pricing
Customers named: Moneyball MediaCrabtree & Evelyninteractive investor
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Albert.ai's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: albert.ai, albert.ai/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Albert.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Albert.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Albert.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Albert.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Albert.ai, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.