Every category where a model named Copy.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI marketing agents	Marketing	2%	11 of 157	10%	20	accepted challenger
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	50 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Copy.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Copy.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase14 labels1

Comparative18 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with HubSpot Agent Hub if you're already on HubSpot, or Copy.ai if you need a standalone solution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for: Lean marketing teams looking to automate heavy, multi-channel campaign creation” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Better for content generation and workflow automation than ad buying or orchestration.” Perplexity Sonar · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · alternative

“HubSpot Agent Hub, Claygent, and Copy.ai are the strongest picks for B2B marketing” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI marketing agents · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Both sit closer to “AI tool with agent features” than full autonomous campaign runners.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Good, but less campaign depth” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI marketing agents · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Copy.ai, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Copy.ai was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Jasper35 of 477Compare →

HubSpot Breeze12 of 475Compare →

Albert.ai10 of 473Not among the top eight

Salesforce Agentforce9 of 470Not among the top eight

HubSpot Agent Hub7 of 472Not among the top eight

Claygent7 of 470Not among the top eight

Enrich Labs6 of 473Not among the top eight

ChatGPT5 of 472Compare →

Superscale AI5 of 472Not among the top eight

Klaviyo AI5 of 470Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Copy.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 47 answers that named Copy.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

folk.app20

blog.hubspot.com19

fueler.io16

supermetrics.com15

factors.ai13

pipeline.zoominfo.com11

flowhunt.io10

okara.ai10

superscale.ai10

thecmo.com10

134 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming Copy.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

folk.app/articles/best-marketing-ai-agents20

supermetrics.com/blog/ai-agents-for-marketing14

flowhunt.io/blog/best-ai-marketing-agents10

fueler.io/blog/top-ai-agents-for-automating-marketing-campaigns10

enrichlabs.ai/ai-marketing-agent9

superscale.ai/compare/the-best-ai-marketing-agents9

fueler.io/blog/top-ai-marketing-agents-automating-campaigns8

mastra.ai/articles/ai-agents-for-marketing8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

copy.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Copy.ai takes 2% of first choices and HubSpot Breeze takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best ai marketing agent”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 5,400 a month (“copy.ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 174 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 76,296 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 12,397 · 413 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 25,096
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 157 in AI marketing agents

Segment leader

24%

HubSpot Breeze

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 47 answers
Its own site cited: in 45 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on copy.ai

3,367

subdomains included

Content

2,496

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

33 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
Blog	1,652	undated	SEO, ABM
Glossary or explainer	332	undated	SEO, CRM
Template or tool	228	undated	SEO
Report or ebook	91	undated	SEO
Comparison	88	undated	ABM
Webinar or virtual event	55	undated	SEO
Podcast or video	31	undated
Case study	12	undated
News or press	6	undated
Conference or event	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page copy.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (57); 1 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Copy.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Copy.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.

Copy.ai (Workflow OS) 1Jasper / Copy.ai 1

Follow Copy.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Copy.ai is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Introducing the first-ever GTM AI platform.
copy.ai
For: go-to-market teams
copy.ai
Free plan or trial: Try for free copy.ai
Integrations claimed: 2000 copy.ai
Customers named: Juniper NetworksLenovoBanzaiDefendify
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, certifications, hosting

What Copy.ai's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: copy.ai, trust.copy.ai, copy.ai/platform/tables, copy.ai/case-studies, copy.ai/tag/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Copy.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Copy.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Copy.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Copy.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Copy.ai, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.