AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Enrich Labs · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Enrich Labs

9Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enrich Labs was named 8 times in AI marketing agents, where HubSpot Breeze led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai marketing agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enrich Labs for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI marketing agentsMarketing2%13 of 1570%8under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enrich Labs yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enrich Labs across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.521003
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enrich Labs is scored 9.6/10 in a 2026 test for being the only platform that “plans, creates, publishes, and optimizes across every channel end to end, from $39/mo.”” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enrich Labs leads for complete marketing execution with a team of specialist agents” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI marketing agents · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. Enrich Labs — Composite score 4.60, best if the bottleneck is content” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI marketing agents · direct prompt · first choice
“Other options include Enrich Labs, which scored 9.6/10 on their rubric and starts at $39/mo” Llama 4 Maverick · AI marketing agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enrich Labs, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enrich Labs was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Copy.ai6 of 90Not among the top eight
Jasper5 of 90Not among the top eight
Superscale AI4 of 91Not among the top eight
HubSpot Breeze4 of 90Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce3 of 90Not among the top eight
FlowHunt2 of 91Not among the top eight
Albert.ai2 of 90Not among the top eight
CrewAI2 of 90Not among the top eight
Klaviyo AI2 of 90Not among the top eight
Klaviyo K:AI2 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enrich Labs. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Enrich Labs and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enrichlabs.aiYour site9
folk.app4
supermetrics.com4
superscale.ai4
intempt.com3
factors.ai2
flowhunt.io2
fueler.io2
hyperfx.ai2
mastra.ai2

Twenty-five of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Enrich Labs came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on enrichlabs.ai
5,242
subdomains included
Content
662
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 3,641
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study281undated
Blog254undatedSEO, Social media
Glossary or explainer53undated
Comparison26undated
Report or ebook25undated
Webinar or virtual event8undated
News or press6undated
Template or tool4undated
Conference or event3undated
Podcast or video2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page enrichlabs.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (12); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Enrich Labs

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enrich Labs's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enrich Labs, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enrich Labs by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Enrich Labs is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enrich Labs, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enrichlabs.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.