AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › CoSchedule Marketing Suite · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

CoSchedule Marketing Suite

80Judge labels
14First choices
8Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Content marketing for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 135 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CoSchedule Marketing Suite →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoSchedule Marketing Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Content marketing platformsMarketing9%2 of 1350%29accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Marketing resource managementMarketing0%28 of 1100%2under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, CoSchedule Marketing Suite held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Content marketing · by segment

Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 120
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 12% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 134
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 19 of 111

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Content marketing12%9%▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 9%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 of 135, unchanged
Marketing resource mgt0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 110, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated CoSchedule Marketing Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503003
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash03104
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2013004
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash12205
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX03104
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B11002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels2
Paraphrase24 labels10
Comparative22 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative80 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CoSchedule Marketing Suite is the most commonly recommended fit for this size team.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend CoSchedule as a strong fit for a mid-sized B2B company's marketing team” Grok 4.20 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick just one tool to recommend: CoSchedule Marketing Suite.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: CoSchedule Marketing Suite” Kimi K2 · Content marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoSchedule Marketing Suite, over the 80 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoSchedule Marketing Suite was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Jasper13 of 800Not among the top eight
Sprinklr Marketing12 of 800Not among the top eight
Optimizely CMS11 of 803Not among the top eight
Notion11 of 801Not among the top eight
Planable11 of 800Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoSchedule Marketing Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 80 answers that named CoSchedule Marketing Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com50
thecmo.com40
trysight.ai37
postiv.ai24
storychief.io22
coschedule.comYour site18
clickup.com17
distribb.io17
gartner.com14
worldmetrics.org14

235 of the 253 domain citations in answers naming CoSchedule Marketing Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

coschedule.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CoSchedule Marketing Suite takes 9% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
20 a month (“coschedule marketing suite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 38,502 a month
Searches its site ranks for
22,478 · 141 in the top three
Sites linking to it
25,313
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
7 ads · 7 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2026, as CoSchedule, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 7 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 2 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
First choices
14 across its categories
Named in
80 answers
Its own site cited
in 77 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on coschedule.com
3,037
subdomains included
Content
1,522
counted in the table below
Documentation
280
Product · Integration
8 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog91002025-02-27SEO, DAM
News or press33392026-09-21Content marketing, Social media
Report or ebook16002025-11-17
Comparison3322026-08-20
Case study2602021-07-26
Podcast or video2002025-05-27
Conference or event1202024-11-06
Template or tool1202023-08-28SEO
Webinar or virtual event802021-09-01
Glossary or explainer802020-09-21
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page coschedule.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (24); 5 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as CoSchedule Marketing Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoSchedule Marketing Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.
CoSchedule 24CoSchedule (Marketing Suite) 1

Follow CoSchedule Marketing Suite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

CoSchedule Marketing Suite is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Finally, A Single Source of Truth For Your Marketing Team
For
your marketing team
Price stated
Starter: $29 USD per month billed annually; Professional: $49 USD per month billed annually; Suite: Custom plans starting at only $69/month. coschedule.com/pricing
Starting price
29 coschedule.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start Your Free Trial coschedule.com
Integrations claimed
18 coschedule.com/pricing
Certifications
Service Provider Initiated SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language)
Customers named
EvernestUSC Alumni AssociationUMASS Memorial HealthOn24SimpleViewLaerdalTimeless Snapshot PhotographyThe Printed Edge
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What CoSchedule Marketing Suite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: coschedule.com/marketing-suite, coschedule.com, coschedule.com/pricing, coschedule.com/support/account-settings/security, coschedule.com/hire-mia/use-case/agencies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoSchedule Marketing Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoSchedule Marketing Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoSchedule Marketing Suite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where CoSchedule Marketing Suite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoSchedule Marketing Suite, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coschedule.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where CoSchedule Marketing Suite is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

CoSchedule Marketing Suite is among the products AI models recommend first in Content marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/content-marketing-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/coschedule-marketing-suite--content-marketing-platforms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content marketing platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/content-marketing-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/coschedule-marketing-suite--content-marketing-platforms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content marketing platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/content-marketing-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/coschedule-marketing-suite--content-marketing-platforms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content marketing platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content marketing platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.