Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 132 → 118 of 120
1 category · RankedSprinklr Marketing
33Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Content marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 25 of 135 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sprinklr Marketing →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business124 of 126
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 135
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise26 of 122
0%19 labels
accepted challenger
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sprinklr Marketing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 25 of 135 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sprinklr Marketing held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 98 → 24 of 134
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 25 of 111
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 98 → 25 of 135 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sprinklr Marketing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sprinklr Marketing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Leader for 5th year. Unified CXM platform with strong content orchestration” Grok 4.20 · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Large-scale social and digital channel management” Kimi K2 · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Social media is your main distribution channel? → Sprinklr” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sprinklr Marketing, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprinklr Marketing was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sprinklr Marketing, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprinklr Marketing was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprinklr Marketing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 33 answers that named Sprinklr Marketing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com21
trysight.ai14
gartner.com13
g2.com11
brafton.com10
cxtoday.com10
eesel.ai8
optimizely.com8
sprinklr.comYour site8
thecmo.com8
103 of the 111 domain citations in answers naming Sprinklr Marketing came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sprinklr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sprinklr Marketing takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sprinklr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sprinklr Marketing takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“sprinklr marketing”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 331,213 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 33,325 · 2,048 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 21,185
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 32 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sprinklr.com
7,762
subdomains included
Content
2,725
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
151 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,983 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 266 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 219 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 94 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 55 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 51 | 0 | 2026-02-03 | ||
| Comparison | 46 | 0 | 2026-04-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2024-04-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2024-09-19 | ||
| Case study | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Race for chatgpt advertising has begun get sprinklr blog
- 2026-09-07New playbook for enterprise paid social operations blog
- 2026-09-02Press Releases news or press
- 2026-08-17Brand compliance blog
- 2026-07-24Why brands get cited in ai answers blog
- 2026-04-16Agentic ai vs mcp comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sprinklr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Sprinklr Marketing
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sprinklr Marketing; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sprinklr 9
Follow Sprinklr Marketing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sprinklr is the company behind Sprinklr Marketing.ShowHide
The company
Sprinklr is the company behind Sprinklr Marketing.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- sprinklr.com
- Headquarters
- New York City, United States
- Founded
- 2009
- Ownership
- Public, CXM on New York Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- integrates every state of the marketing lifecycle across digital into a single platform
- For
- marketing teams
- Certifications
- Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Social Media Management & ListeningSprinklr Recognized as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Content Marketing Platforms, for the Sixth Time in a Row
- Customers named
- Royal Dutch Shell PlcShellNikeMcDonald’sMicrosoftP&GSamsung
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Sprinklr Marketing's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sprinklr.com/demo-sprinklr-marketing, sprinklr.com/resources/scaling-marketing-with-sprinklr-insights, sprinklr.com/newsroom/sprinklr-wins-2020-dmn-marketing-cloud-company-year-award, sprinklr.com/newsroom/shell-chooses-sprinklr-customer-centric-marketing-advertising, sprinklr.com/newsroom/sprinklr-named-leader-independent-content-marketing-platforms-report. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprinklr Marketing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprinklr Marketing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sprinklr Marketing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sprinklr Marketing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sprinklr Marketing, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.