Every category where a model named Skyword for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	52 of 159	33%	6	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skyword yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skyword across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“managed/enterprise platforms with vetted freelance networks; custom-priced... Good if content *production at scale* with outside talent is your model.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · scale prompt · alternative

“End-to-end (creation to measurement), freelance network. Gartner: 4.4/5. | Higher cost for services.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Content marketing · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Creative Workflows & Managed Services: Skyword (Accelerator360)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Content marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The "Gated Talent Network" Platforms (e.g., Contently, Skyword)... Lack of Pricing Transparency” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

“unclear approval flows, slow communication, and UI/performance issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skyword, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skyword was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Contently18 of 250Not in the top three

HubSpot Content Hub15 of 256Not in the top three

CoSchedule13 of 253Not in the top three

Adobe GenStudio10 of 250Not in the top three

Optimizely CMS8 of 252Not in the top three

Seismic8 of 250Not in the top three

Buffer7 of 250Not in the top three

Contentful7 of 250Not in the top three

Sprinklr7 of 250Not in the top three

Optimizely CMP6 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skyword. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 25 answers that named Skyword and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adobe.com1

gartner.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Skyword came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adobe.com/content/dam/cc/us/en/security/pdfs/CCE_security_whitepaper.pdf1

gartner.com/en/documents/62452191

gartner.com/reviews/product/hubspot-content-hub1

gartner.com/reviews/vendor/contently1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Skyword

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Skyword; a claim can dispute any of them.

Skyword (Accelerator360) 1Skyword / Contently 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skyword's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skyword, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skyword.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.