Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 109 of 134, unchanged
3 categories · RankedAcquia
18Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Content marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 132 of 135 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 60% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market132 of 135
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise93 of 122
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Acquia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 132 of 135 | 60% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 98 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25% | |
| Customer data platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 60 of 61 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Acquia held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Content marketing · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 60 of 111, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 132 of 135, unchanged |
| Website governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 98, unchanged |
| CDP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Acquia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Acquia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Acquia serves organizations already on Acquia's Drupal or DXP stack and ties governance directly into content operations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Acquia stands out with an open-source foundation and AI-driven content creation/optimization.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“good for Drupal/Acquia ecosystems, compliance monitoring” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Dropped out of Gartner's Magic Quadrant entirely in 2025 ... their absence is a significant red flag” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Dropped out of the 2025 Magic Quadrant, but still strong for companies that primarily need sophisticated asset management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Reviews suggest limitations in automated reporting and bulk actions ... this platform may feel restrictive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CDP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Acquia dropped out of the study completely. Gartner removed Acquia from the 2025 evaluation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acquia, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Acquia, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acquia was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acquia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 18 answers that named Acquia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com9
cxtoday.com7
trysight.ai6
guideflow.com5
zapier.com5
blog.hubspot.com4
brafton.com4
silktide.com4
techradar.com4
thecmo.com4
Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Acquia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
acquia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acquia takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
acquia.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acquia takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“acquia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 216 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 72,942 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,526 · 732 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,815
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 51 clicks and $2,943 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 132 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 18 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on acquia.com
4,520
subdomains included
Content
1,916
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
98 · 300
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 590 | 5 | 2026-10-22 | DAM, CDP | |
| Blog | 550 | 16 | 2026-09-17 | DAM, CDP | |
| Case study | 351 | undated | DAM | ||
| Report or ebook | 239 | undated | CDP, DAM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 74 | 0 | 2024-03-12 | CDP, DAM | |
| Comparison | 41 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | DAM, CDP | |
| Conference or event | 31 | 21 | 2026-11-19 | DAM | |
| Template or tool | 23 | undated | DAM, CDP | ||
| Podcast or video | 15 | 0 | 2020-05-29 | DAM, CDP | |
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2021-03-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-19Drupalcamp spain conference or event
- 2026-11-13New england drupal camp conference or event
- 2026-11-12Acquia dam workshop navigating new era dam san francisco conference or event
- 2026-10-29Scottish web folk conference conference or event
- 2026-10-29Acquia dam workshop navigating new era dam dc conference or event
- 2026-10-23Southwestern ontario drupal camp conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page acquia.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DAM (181); 60 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Acquia
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acquia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acquia (formerly Monsido) 2Acquia (Drupal-based) 1
Follow Acquia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Acquia.ShowHide
The company
Acquia.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- acquia.com
- Headquarters
- Boston, United States
- Founded
- 2007
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Agentic Content Platform that marketing loves and IT teams trust
- For
- enterprise marketing teams, including Fortune 500 brands, government agencies, and global universities
- Integrations claimed
- 280 acquia.com
- Certifications
- FedRAMPHIPAAPractice Certification PartnersCertified GSIs
- Customers named
- Dana-FarberBayerAB InBevMarsCrayolaShake ShackTrussellUNICEF
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Acquia's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: acquia.com, acquia.com/security, acquia.com/solutions/ai, acquia.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acquia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acquia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acquia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Acquia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acquia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.