| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content management systems for marketing sites | Marketing | 0% | 53 of 55 | 70% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 135 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 0% | 29 of 98 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25% | |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 69 of 109 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing CMS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 53 of 55 |
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 97 → 23 of 135 |
| Website governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 98, unchanged |
| Creative automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 109, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose HubSpot or Adobe Experience Manager for advanced marketing automation and personalization” Mistral Small · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · first choice
“Adobe Experience Manager — Leader in Gartner CMP Magic Quadrant” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · first choice
“A high-end Content Management System that enforces strict governance rules at the point of creation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Offers deep approval workflows, multi-step review chains, and fine-grained role management” Mistral Small · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you cannot afford the slow implementation speeds or high costs of legacy enterprise giants (like Adobe Experience Manager or Sitecore)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · soft negative
“typically not large enough to justify the heaviest enterprise platforms (like Adobe AEM or Sitecore) without careful analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · soft negative
“That's a short horizon for a new implementation unless there's a specific upgrade or migration plan.” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over-Engineered Enterprise Suites... steep learning curves, massive implementation timelines” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 116 answers that named Adobe Experience Manager and are not a share of its labels.
255 of the 255 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Experience Manager came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Adobe Experience Manager's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/experience-manager, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager/reference-materials, developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/experience-manager-apis, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Experience Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Experience Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Experience Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: