Adobe Experience Manager

Named in 13 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 9 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

0% in Marketing CMS

Rank 39 of 39 products named in content management systems for marketing sites, criticized challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 69% of its 13 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Experience Manager. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content management systems for marketing sites	Marketing	0%	39 of 39	69%	13	criticized challenger

By model

How each model treated Adobe Experience Manager across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	0	0	2	2
Claude Opus 4.8	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Astra	0	1	2	3
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	1	2	3
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	0	2	2

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Large enterprise with complex needs: Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, or WordPress VIP” Claude Opus 4.8 · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High implementation complexity and total cost. Usually inappropriate unless the organization has substantial scale and Adobe-platform requirements.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Adobe Experience Manager for a mid-market site ... the total implementation and operating model may outweigh the benefit.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative

“often described as complex, expensive, and best suited to organizations with governance needs and dedicated teams” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative

“legitimately powerful, but for a pure marketing site they're frequently a mismatch — six-figure licensing” Claude Opus 5 · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative

Names read as Adobe Experience Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Experience Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.

AEM 2Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 2Adobe Experience Manager Sites 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Experience Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.