AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Adobe Experience Manager · October 2026 Edition
Adobe · 4 categories · Ranked

Adobe Experience Manager

116Judge labels
13First choices
44Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
22% in Marketing CMS for enterprise buyers
Rank 53 of 55 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 70% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Adobe Experience Manager →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In marketing cms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adobe Experience Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Content management systems for marketing sitesMarketing0%53 of 5570%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%23 of 1350%8under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Website governance and accessibilityMarketing0%29 of 980%3under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25%
Creative automation platformsMarketing0%69 of 1090%1under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19%

Movement

Since September 2026, Adobe Experience Manager held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Marketing CMS · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 62 → 49 of 49
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 48 of 52
Enterprise▲+11Since September 2026: 12% → 23%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
23%from 12% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 0 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 49

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Marketing CMS0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 51 → 53 of 55
Content marketing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 97 → 23 of 135
Website governance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 29 of 98, unchanged
Creative automation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 69 of 109, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Adobe Experience Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00022
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small11305
DeepSeek V4 Flash10113
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02024
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels2
Paraphrase18 labels9
Comparative28 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained18 labelsNone
Negative28 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative116 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 21 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose HubSpot or Adobe Experience Manager for advanced marketing automation and personalization” Mistral Small · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · first choice
“Adobe Experience Manager — Leader in Gartner CMP Magic Quadrant” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · first choice
“A high-end Content Management System that enforces strict governance rules at the point of creation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative
“Offers deep approval workflows, multi-step review chains, and fine-grained role management” Mistral Small · Website governance · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you cannot afford the slow implementation speeds or high costs of legacy enterprise giants (like Adobe Experience Manager or Sitecore)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · soft negative
“typically not large enough to justify the heaviest enterprise platforms (like Adobe AEM or Sitecore) without careful analysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · soft negative
“That's a short horizon for a new implementation unless there's a specific upgrade or migration plan.” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“Over-Engineered Enterprise Suites... steep learning curves, massive implementation timelines” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adobe Experience Manager, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Experience Manager was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Contentful71 of 1164Not among the top eight
Sitecore Experience Platform60 of 1162Not among the top eight
HubSpot Content Hub52 of 11615Not among the top eight
WordPress52 of 1167Not among the top eight
Drupal40 of 1161Not among the top eight
Sanity34 of 1162Not among the top eight
Optimizely CMS32 of 1164Not among the top eight
Webflow28 of 1166Not among the top eight
Contentstack21 of 1163Not among the top eight
Storyblok20 of 1161Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Experience Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 116 answers that named Adobe Experience Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com43
guideflow.com38
webstacks.com30
coremedia.com28
linkedin.com27
g2.com20
brightspot.com19
webflow.com18
gartner.com16
trysight.ai16

255 of the 255 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Experience Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Adobe Experience Manager stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
4,400 a month (“adobe experience manager”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
169 a month
Its own site
It sits on Adobe's site (adobe.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 53 of 55 in Marketing CMS
Segment leader
42%
HubSpot Content Hub
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
116 answers
Its own site cited
in 99 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Adobe Experience Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Experience Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 7Adobe AEM 2Adobe Experience Manager / Marketo 1Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 1

Follow Adobe Experience Manager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Adobe is the company behind Adobe Experience Manager.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
adobe.com
Headquarters
San Jose, United States
Founded
1982
Employees
about 25,988 (2021)
Ownership
Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Whether you’re building full‑stack sites, headless APIs, or ultra‑fast Edge Delivery Services projects, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) gives you opinionated pipeline & modern dev tooling. Now agentic assistance keeps your experiences fast, secure, and maintainable.
Certifications
Adobe certification
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Adobe Experience Manager's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/experience-manager, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager/reference-materials, developer.adobe.com/experience-cloud/experience-manager-apis, developer.adobe.com/experience-manager-forms-cloud-service-developer-reference/api. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Experience Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Experience Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Experience Manager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Adobe Experience Manager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Experience Manager, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adobe.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.