Drupal

Named in 11 judge labels across 1 category by 5 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 7 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

0% in Marketing CMS

Rank 38 of 39 products named in content management systems for marketing sites, criticized challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 64% of its 11 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Drupal. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content management systems for marketing sites	Marketing	0%	38 of 39	64%	11	criticized challenger

By model

How each model treated Drupal across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	1	2	4
Claude Opus 4.8	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Astra	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	1	2	3
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	0	1	1

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Complex governance, many sites, many languages → Drupal or an enterprise DXP” Claude Opus 5 · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative

“Complex, multilingual sites with substantial content-management requirements” GPT-6 Astra · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“community security support ended on January 5, 2025... I would not choose it for a new marketing website” GPT-6 Astra · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · hard negative

“official support from the Drupal Association and Security Team ended January 5, 2025” Claude Opus 5 · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · hard negative

“Drupal 7 — security support ended January 5, 2025.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · hard negative

“Drupal 8 (EOL 2021)... same category” Claude Opus 5 · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · hard negative

Names read as Drupal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Drupal; a claim can dispute any of them.

Drupal 7 3Drupal 8 1managed Drupal implementations 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Drupal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.