AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Webflow · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Webflow

214Judge labels
29First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in Marketing CMS for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 55 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 55 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Webflow →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In marketing cms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Webflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Content management systems for marketing sitesMarketing21%3 of 557%55accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Landing pages and interactive contentMarketing0%23 of 6912%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Webflow held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Marketing CMS · by segment

Small business▼−24Since September 2026: 47% → 23%, −24 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
23%from 47% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 13 pointsRank 1 → 3 of 49
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 52
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 8 of 49

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Marketing CMS22%18%▼−5Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 2 → 3 of 55
Landing pages0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 14 → 23 of 69

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Webflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini22116
Gemini 3.5 Flash23016
Perplexity Sonar04004
Grok 4.1 Fast14218
Mistral Small04217
DeepSeek V4 Flash14016
Llama 4 Maverick02204
Qwen 3.7 Flash14308
Kimi K225108
GLM 4.7 FlashX04004
MiniMax M2.504004
GPT-6 Luna23027
Muse Glimmer 30B10405

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct50 labels11
Paraphrase25 labels11
Comparative48 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels3
Scale-constrained32 labels4
Negative39 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative214 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 45 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd usually recommend Webflow if the priority is speed, design control, and giving marketers the ability to launch and edit pages without waiting on engineers” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing CMS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“a modern marketing-focused CMS (HubSpot CMS, Webflow, Ghost, or composable headless + frontend) delivers better agility and lower TCO” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · first choice
“Webflow offers the strongest balance of premium visual design, ease-of-use for marketers, and clean, fast-loading performance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing CMS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Webflow if you're starting fresh and want the best balance of design quality, marketer control, and reasonable cost” Kimi K2 · Marketing CMS · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“if you need more design control and can justify the higher CMS plan cost; its current Premium plan is $25/month billed yearly” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · budget prompt · soft negative
“Webflow on lower tiers can miss CMS availability and advanced permissioning; several access controls are Enterprise-only.” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“its code export omits CMS functionality and content; forms and search also won't work as they do on Webflow hosting” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“They do not, however, offer the easy out-of-the-box A/B testing or ad personalization features of Unbounce.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Webflow, over the 214 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Webflow was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Contentful73 of 2141Not among the top eight
Instapage66 of 21430Not among the top eight
Unbounce65 of 21418Not among the top eight
Wix59 of 2140Not among the top eight
Sanity51 of 2140Not among the top eight
Leadpages43 of 2148Not among the top eight
Drupal32 of 2141Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Webflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 192 of the 214 answers that named Webflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com59
webflow.comYour site56
blog.hubspot.com48
webstacks.com40
linkedin.com39
prismic.io33
forbes.com32
zoho.com32
elementor.com28
impactplus.com27

338 of the 394 domain citations in answers naming Webflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

webflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Webflow takes 21% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 42%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing website cms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
74,000 a month (“webflow”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,193 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 714,656 a month
Searches its site ranks for
160,570 · 4,344 in the top three
Sites linking to it
171,508
Paid Google search
3 searches its ads show for, about 6 clicks and $690 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
101+ ads · 43 text, 36 video, 22 image · 59 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Webflow, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 97 in the year, 4 before. 19 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
21%
rank 3 of 55 in Marketing CMS
Segment leader
42%
HubSpot Content Hub
First choices
29 across its categories
Named in
214 answers
Its own site cited
in 192 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on webflow.com
125,330
subdomains included
Content
5,208
counted in the table below
Documentation
909
Product · Integration
43 · 523
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool2,864undated
Blog1,580undated
Conference or event229undated
Webinar or virtual event92undated
Comparison91undated
Report or ebook89undated
Case study87undated
News or press73undated
Podcast or video52undated
Glossary or explainer51undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page webflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Webflow

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Webflow; a claim can dispute any of them.
Webflow Enterprise 2Webflow / Framer 1

Follow Webflow

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Webflow.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2013

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the agentic web platform for modern businesses
For
Marketing teams, designers, developers, agencies, and enterprises building professional websites
Price stated
Starter Free; Basic $15/mo billed yearly; Premium $25/mo billed yearly; Team $2,500/mo; Enterprise Custom; Standard $29/mo billed yearly; Plus $74/mo billed yearly; Advanced $212/mo billed yearly; Starter Workspace Free; Core $19/mo billed yearly; Growth $49/mo billed yearly; Freelancer $16/mo billed yearly; Agency $35/mo billed yearly webflow.com/pricing
Starting price
Free webflow.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Create a free Webflow account and start building your website. webflow.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IICCPAGDPRWebflow PractitionerISO 27001 compliantSOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Customers named
ABMAmazonArkose LabsBBDOClayCivilizationCopy.aiDocusign
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Webflow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: webflow.com, webflow.com/pricing, trust.webflow.com, webflow.com/platform, webflow.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Webflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Webflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Webflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Webflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Webflow, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at webflow.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Webflow is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Webflow is among the products AI models recommend first in Content management systems for marketing sites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/marketing-cms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/webflow--marketing-cms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content management systems for marketing sites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/marketing-cms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/webflow--marketing-cms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content management systems for marketing sites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/marketing-cms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/webflow--marketing-cms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Content management systems for marketing sites, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Content management systems for marketing sites standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.