Webflow

Named in 29 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 12 first choices, 2 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

44% in Marketing CMS

Rank 1 of 39 products named in content management systems for marketing sites, endorsed leader. 4 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 29 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Webflow. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content management systems for marketing sites	Marketing	44%	1 of 39	7%	29	endorsed leader

By model

How each model treated Webflow across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	3	1	1	0	5
Claude Opus 4.8	3	2	0	0	5
GPT-6 Astra	4	1	0	1	6
GPT-5.6 Sol	2	1	1	1	5
Gemini 3.1 Pro	2	2	1	0	5
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	2	0	0	3

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Marketing/design owns the site; limited ongoing engineering | Webflow. Its Enterprise offering includes shared design libraries, publishing workflows, custom roles, and localization.” GPT-6 Astra · Marketing CMS · scale prompt · first choice

“For a typical mid-market B2B software company, I’d choose Webflow—usually its Team or Enterprise offering—as the default marketing-site CMS.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · direct prompt · first choice

“Webflow has become the gold standard for B2B software companies ... that want highly custom, beautifully animated websites” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Marketing CMS · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“For a conventional company marketing website, I would normally shortlist Webflow, WordPress, and HubSpot first.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“its Site and Workspace pricing structure can make it less budget-friendly” GPT-5.6 Sol · Marketing CMS · budget prompt · soft negative

“Don’t accept “you can export the code” as proof of an easy exit.” GPT-6 Astra · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative

Names read as Webflow

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Webflow; a claim can dispute any of them.

Webflow Enterprise 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Webflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.