| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content management systems for marketing sites | Marketing | 21% | 3 of 55 | 7% | 55 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 69 | 12% | 24 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing CMS | 22% | 18% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 22% → 18%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 55 |
| Landing pages | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 23 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd usually recommend Webflow if the priority is speed, design control, and giving marketers the ability to launch and edit pages without waiting on engineers” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing CMS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“a modern marketing-focused CMS (HubSpot CMS, Webflow, Ghost, or composable headless + frontend) delivers better agility and lower TCO” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · first choice
“Webflow offers the strongest balance of premium visual design, ease-of-use for marketers, and clean, fast-loading performance” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing CMS · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Webflow if you're starting fresh and want the best balance of design quality, marketer control, and reasonable cost” Kimi K2 · Marketing CMS · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“if you need more design control and can justify the higher CMS plan cost; its current Premium plan is $25/month billed yearly” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · budget prompt · soft negative
“Webflow on lower tiers can miss CMS availability and advanced permissioning; several access controls are Enterprise-only.” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“its code export omits CMS functionality and content; forms and search also won't work as they do on Webflow hosting” GPT-6 Luna · Marketing CMS · negative prompt · soft negative
“They do not, however, offer the easy out-of-the-box A/B testing or ad personalization features of Unbounce.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 192 of the 214 answers that named Webflow and are not a share of its labels.
338 of the 394 domain citations in answers naming Webflow came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 2,864 | undated | |||
| Blog | 1,580 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 229 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 92 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 91 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 89 | undated | |||
| Case study | 87 | undated | |||
| News or press | 73 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 52 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 51 | undated |
Every page webflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Webflow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: webflow.com, webflow.com/pricing, trust.webflow.com, webflow.com/platform, webflow.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Webflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Webflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Webflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Webflow is among the products AI models recommend first in Content management systems for marketing sites this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.