Small business▼−8Since September 2026: 26% → 19%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
19%from 26% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 → 2 of 54
1 category · RankedLeadpages
128Judge labels
16First choices
29Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Landing pages for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 69 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Leadpages →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 55
19%57 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market8 of 69
2%48 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise5 of 74
5%23 labels
criticized challenger
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Leadpages for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 2% | 8 of 69 | 25% | 48 | criticized challenger | ▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Leadpages held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Landing pages · by segment
Mid-market▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 11% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 66
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages | 11% | 2% | ▼−9Since September 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 8 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Leadpages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Leadpages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct26 labels7
Paraphrase12 labels4
Comparative31 labels10not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels4
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative27 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative128 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Positioned as best overall for lead generation... Pick Leadpages for fast, conversion-focused lead gen pages on a tight budget with no traffic caps.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Landing pages · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best landing page builder for a mid-market B2B company is likely to be Leadpages or Swipe Pages” Llama 4 Maverick · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice
“Best overall for most marketers: Leadpages.” GPT-5.4 mini · Landing pages · comparative prompt · first choice
“Safer bets: Leadpages for most users” Kimi K2 · Landing pages · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“data loss (pages/leads deleted during updates); poor exporting; auto-renew policies seen as shady” Grok 4.20 · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium tools like Unbounce or Leadpages if your budget is strictly limited.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · budget prompt · hard negative
“Leadpages offers only basic Google OAuth SSO for the account owner; team members cannot use SSO ... creating identity management gaps” Muse Glimmer 30B · Landing pages · scale prompt · soft negative
“frustration with rigid templates that limit creative freedom ... complaints about raising prices” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leadpages, over the 128 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leadpages was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Leadpages, over the 128 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leadpages was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leadpages. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 120 of the 128 answers that named Leadpages and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
perspective.co58
leadpages.comYour site56
zoho.com56
g2.com48
guideflow.com41
forbes.com40
prismic.io40
zapier.com39
unbounce.com37
profitbooks.net36
395 of the 451 domain citations in answers naming Leadpages came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leadpages.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leadpages takes 2% of first choices and Unbounce takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leadpages.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Leadpages takes 2% of first choices and Unbounce takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“leadpages”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 102 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 23,105 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,193 · 259 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,889
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 69 in landing pages
Segment leader
30%
Unbounce
- First choices
- 16 across its categories
- Named in
- 128 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 120 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leadpages.com
1,875
subdomains included
Content
1,680
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
38 · 19
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,210 | 19 | 2026-09-24 | SEO, Landing pages | |
| Template or tool | 258 | undated | CRM, SEO | ||
| Podcast or video | 67 | 0 | 2026-02-07 | Landing pages, SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 42 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | SEO, Landing pages | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 33 | 0 | 2025-04-16 | ||
| Comparison | 33 | 2 | 2026-07-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 25 | 0 | 2023-06-29 | ||
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-14 | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2016-03-16 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2024-05-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Leadpages components shared headers footers scripts pixels blog
- 2026-09-17Leadpages page grading optimization score blog
- 2026-09-16How meta google linkedin grade landing page experience blog
- 2026-09-16Leadpages ai blog writer schedule blog
- 2026-09-122026 site builder shortlist paid traffic time to launch blog
- 2026-09-12Heatmaps now built into leadpages blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leadpages.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (39); 17 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Leadpages
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Leadpages is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Leadpages is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI landing page builder with A/B Testing & Heatmaps
- For
- small businesses and marketers
- Price stated
- Leadpages plans start at $99/month for Grow, $199/month for Optimize, and $399/month for Scale leadpages.com
- Starting price
- $99/mo leadpages.com
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial leadpages.com
- Integrations claimed
- 200 leadpages.com · 50 leadpages.com/platform pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named
- Nancy JuettenShelbyPJ WrenManpowerGroupBrandiMari SmithJereshia HawkTeri Ijeoma
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Leadpages's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leadpages.com, leadpages.com/pricing, leadpages.com/security, leadpages.com/platform, leadpages.com/blog/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leadpages's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leadpages, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Leadpages by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Leadpages is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Leadpages, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.