GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › HubSpot Landing Pages · September 2026 Edition
HubSpot · 1 category · Ranked

HubSpot Landing Pages

85Judge labels
8First choices
13Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Landing pages for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 22 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HubSpot Landing Pages for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Landing pages and interactive contentMarketing2%10 of 789%22accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HubSpot Landing Pages yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HubSpot Landing Pages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.1 Fast04004
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash12104
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels5
Paraphrase12 labels3
Comparative23 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative12 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“🥇 HubSpot Landing Pages — *Best if you're already on HubSpot*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice
“if you're already deeply invested in HubSpot, staying within that ecosystem is often the smartest move despite the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · direct prompt · alternative
“HubSpot is also a great option as it offers limited versions of its all-in-one marketing solutions for free” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · budget prompt · alternative
“Enterprise fits: Instapage, Landingi, Unbounce, HubSpot Landing Pages, Webflow Enterprise.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Landing pages · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Verdict: Be cautious. Only use these builders if your organization is already fully committed” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
“though it's not a pure landing-page specialist” GPT-5.4 mini · Landing pages · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Landing Pages, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Landing Pages was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Unbounce78 of 8520Not in the top three
Instapage63 of 8523Not in the top three
Leadpages57 of 8517Not in the top three
Landingi36 of 857Not in the top three
Carrd32 of 855Not in the top three
Webflow31 of 850Not in the top three
Swipe Pages18 of 850Not in the top three
MailerLite14 of 851Not in the top three
ClickFunnels11 of 850Not in the top three
Wix10 of 851Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Landing Pages. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 85 answers that named HubSpot Landing Pages and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

unbounce.com13
zoho.com12
ventureharbour.com11
leadpages.com10
zapier.com10
perspective.co9
prismic.io9
uithings.com7
emailvendorselection.com6
involve.me6

Ninety-three of the ninety-three domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Landing Pages came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HubSpot Landing Pages

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot Landing Pages; a claim can dispute any of them.
HubSpot 17

The company

HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Landing Pages.
Website
hubspot.com
Headquarters
Cambridge, United States
Founded
2006
Employees
about 8,246 (2024)
Ownership
Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Landing Pages's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Landing Pages, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hubspot.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack