Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 54
HubSpot · 1 category · RankedHubSpot Landing Pages
73Judge labels
11First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Landing pages for small business buyers
Rank 5 of 69 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 24 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of HubSpot Landing Pages →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 55
8%21 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market5 of 69
6%24 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise7 of 74
4%28 labels
accepted challenger
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HubSpot Landing Pages for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 6% | 5 of 69 | 4% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HubSpot Landing Pages held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Landing pages · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 10 → 5 of 66
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages | 2% | 5% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 5 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Landing Pages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Landing Pages across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels4
Paraphrase13 labels7
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative73 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“My default recommendation: HubSpot for landing pages + Outgrow for interactive content” GPT-6 Luna · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For B2B teams already using HubSpot, adding landing pages is a strong fit.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice
“Why HubSpot is the safest default for mid-sized B2B” Perplexity Sonar · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Recommendation: HubSpot” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Extremely expensive; the drag-and-drop editor can feel sluggish compared to dedicated tools.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Landing Pages, over the 73 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Landing Pages was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Landing Pages, over the 73 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Landing Pages was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Landing Pages. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 73 answers that named HubSpot Landing Pages and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
zoho.com36
perspective.co34
leadpages.com28
instapage.com26
guideflow.com25
involve.me23
prismic.io20
ventureharbour.com20
unbounce.com19
blog.hubspot.comYour site17
231 of the 248 domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Landing Pages came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Landing Pages stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Landing Pages stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“hubspot landing pages”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on HubSpot's site (hubspot.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
6%
rank 5 of 69 in landing pages
Segment leader
30%
Unbounce
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 73 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 68 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as HubSpot Landing Pages
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot Landing Pages; a claim can dispute any of them.
HubSpot 18HubSpot (Marketing Hub) 1HubSpot Marketing Hub Landing Pages 1HubSpot landing pages 1
Follow HubSpot Landing Pages
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Landing Pages.ShowHide
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Landing Pages.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- hubspot.com
- Headquarters
- Cambridge, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Employees
- about 8,246 (2024)
- Ownership
- Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange
- Also from HubSpot
- HubSpot, HubSpot ABM, HubSpot AEO Grader, HubSpot AI, HubSpot Academy, HubSpot Ad Management, HubSpot Ads, HubSpot Ads Management and 77 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Free Landing Page Builder
- Price stated
- Free academy.hubspot.com/hubspot-marketing-software
- Free plan or trial
- Free academy.hubspot.com/hubspot-marketing-software
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What HubSpot Landing Pages's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: academy.hubspot.com/hubspot-marketing-software, academy.hubspot.com/creating-landing-pages-in-hubspot, academy.hubspot.com/creating-free-landing-pages-with-hubspot-en, academy.hubspot.com/creating-free-landing-pages-with-hubspot-es, academy.hubspot.com/developing-lead-generation-campaign-hubspot. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Landing Pages's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Landing Pages, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot Landing Pages by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HubSpot Landing Pages is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HubSpot Landing Pages, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.