GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › ClickFunnels · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

ClickFunnels

26Judge labels

0First choices

20Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ClickFunnels was named 9 times in Landing pages and 1 other category, where Unbounce led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business67 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market78 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprise74 of 76

under the label threshold

In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ClickFunnels for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Landing pages and interactive content	Marketing	0%	78 of 78	75%	8	under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 28%
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	82 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClickFunnels yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClickFunnels across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative20 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ClickFunnels — best for sales funnels, upsells, and checkout-driven offers” GPT-5.4 mini · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for full sales funnels (not just pages)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid completely if: You're on a budget and need just clean landing pages (skip ClickFunnels/Kartra)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid for billing/reputation: Unbounce (especially on price), ClickFunnels, Leadpages” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Avoid unless you are specifically running complex, multi-step sales funnels” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

“Strongly Avoid These Builders ... ClickFunnels ... Risk score: 100/100 (Severe)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickFunnels, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickFunnels was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Leadpages22 of 264Not in the top three

Unbounce22 of 264Not in the top three

Instapage19 of 267Not in the top three

Carrd14 of 264Not in the top three

Landingi12 of 260Not in the top three

HubSpot Landing Pages11 of 261Not in the top three

Webflow10 of 260Not in the top three

Swipe Pages9 of 261Not in the top three

Wix9 of 261Not in the top three

Elementor7 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickFunnels. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 26 answers that named ClickFunnels and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

leadpages.com3

zoho.com3

getresponse.com2

shno.co2

websiteplanet.com2

zapier.com2

agilityportal.io1

apexure.com1

apps.shopify.com1

blog.convertri.com1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming ClickFunnels came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getresponse.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders2

leadpages.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders-for-digital-agencies-20262

shno.co/tools/best-landing-page-builders2

websiteplanet.com/landing-page-creators2

zapier.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders2

agilityportal.io/blog/best-website-builder-for-large-business-20261

apexure.com/blog/8-best-landing-page-builders-pros-and-cons1

apps.shopify.com/reviews/8956271

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickFunnels's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickFunnels, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clickfunnels.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.