AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › ClickFunnels · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

ClickFunnels

38Judge labels
0First choices
20Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Landing pages for mid-market buyers
Rank 27 of 69 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 29% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of ClickFunnels →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ClickFunnels for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Landing pages and interactive contentMarketing0%27 of 6929%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel0%43 of 940%1under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Marketing automation and campaign managementMarketing0%50 of 59100%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Webinar and virtual event platformsMarketing0%58 of 67100%1under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, ClickFunnels held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Landing pages · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 53 of 54
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 77 → 27 of 66
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 72 → 69 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Landing pages0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 77 → 27 of 69
Affiliate0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 43 of 94, unchanged
Marketing automation0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 50 of 59, unchanged
Webinars0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 58 of 67, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ClickFunnels across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01124
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative21 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ClickFunnels if: You are selling a digital product or course” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative
“ClickFunnels — Best for Full Sales Funnels & Ecommerce” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative
“ClickFunnels — Best for Full Sales Funnels” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for funnels/sales: ClickFunnels.” GPT-5.4 mini · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why to avoid: While tools like ClickFunnels are great for building landing pages, their native email automation is usually weak.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Who should avoid: Anyone who just needs a clean, standalone landing page and is on a budget.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: ClickFunnels (unless you have a dedicated funnel manager)” Kimi K2 · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“ClickFunnels can be expensive and may not offer the best value for simple landing page needs” Mistral Small · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickFunnels, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickFunnels was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Unbounce30 of 389Not among the top eight
Instapage30 of 386Not among the top eight
Leadpages30 of 383Not among the top eight
Carrd20 of 382Not among the top eight
Wix18 of 380Not among the top eight
Webflow17 of 381Not among the top eight
Landingi14 of 382Not among the top eight
HubSpot Landing Pages11 of 380Not among the top eight
Squarespace9 of 380Not among the top eight
Systeme.io8 of 382Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickFunnels. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 38 answers that named ClickFunnels and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16
perspective.co14
leadpages.com11
instapage.com9
clickfunnels.comYour site8
zoho.com8
apexure.com7
bitrix24.com7
forbes.com7
scoreapp.com7

Eighty-six of the ninety-four domain citations in answers naming ClickFunnels came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

clickfunnels.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ClickFunnels takes 0% of first choices and Unbounce takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
8,100 a month (“clickfunnels”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
636 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 33,052 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,578 · 367 in the top three
Sites linking to it
34,365
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
23+ ads · 13 video, 6 image, 4 text · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2026, as john Howell, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 23 in the year. 97 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 69 in landing pages
Segment leader
30%
Unbounce
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
38 answers
Its own site cited
in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on clickfunnels.com
2,921
subdomains included
Content
1,513
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
11 · 18
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool1,47802019-03-31
Blog2082026-09-24
Glossary or explainer11undated
Comparison332026-08-27
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page clickfunnels.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow ClickFunnels

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ClickFunnels is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Marketing Funnels Made Easy
For
Creators
Price stated
Launch ~$97~ $81/mo billed annually (Save $194/year); Scale ~$197~ $164/mo billed annually (Save $394/year); Optimize ~$297~ $248/mo billed annually (Save $594/year); Dominate $5,997/yr; Launch $97/mo; Scale $197/mo; Optimize $297/mo clickfunnels.com/pricing
Starting price
81 clickfunnels.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try for Free clickfunnels.com
Integrations claimed
19 clickfunnels.com/integrations
Hosting
40 Edge servers all around the world
Customers named
Trent SheltonPace MorbyEileen WilderLamar TylerJosh BrownAnthony TrucksKristine MirelleTed Harty
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What ClickFunnels's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: clickfunnels.com, clickfunnels.com/pricing, clickfunnels.com/features/crm, clickfunnels.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickFunnels's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickFunnels, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ClickFunnels by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ClickFunnels is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ClickFunnels, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clickfunnels.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.