Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 9 of 54
7 categories · RankedSysteme.io
26Judge labels
8First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Landing pages for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 69 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business8 of 55
3%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 69
3%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise67 of 74
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Systeme.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 3% | 6 of 69 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 22 of 135 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 2% | 18 of 124 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Affiliate and partner management | Partner and channel | 0% | 26 of 94 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 61 of 115 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 39 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 62 of 112 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Systeme.io held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Landing pages · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 40 → 6 of 66
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 64 of 71, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 6 of 69 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 124, unchanged |
| Content marketing | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 22 of 135 |
| Affiliate | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 94, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 115, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 66, unchanged |
| Referrals | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 112, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Systeme.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Systeme.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained19 labels8
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“alternatives like Brizy or Systeme.io were frequently recommended on Reddit as more modern, flexible, and better-priced alternatives” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · first choice
“Go with Systeme.io if you are a solo entrepreneur or small business looking for a single, zero-dollar platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Content marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with a general marketing automation tool like Systeme.io or Brevo” MiniMax M2.5 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Systeme.io is highly recommended... Choose Systeme.io (Free) if you have a $0 budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Systeme.io, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Systeme.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Systeme.io, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Systeme.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Systeme.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named Systeme.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com7
sender.net7
reddit.com6
systeme.ioYour site6
emailvendorselection.com5
getresponse.com5
influencermarketinghub.com5
sequenzy.com5
thecmo.com5
youtube.com5
Fifty of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming Systeme.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
systeme.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Systeme.io takes 3% of first choices and Unbounce takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
systeme.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Systeme.io takes 3% of first choices and Unbounce takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“systeme.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 210 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 146,684 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,458 · 190 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 50,427
- Paid Google search
- 9 searches its ads show for, about 661 clicks and $2,621 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 6 of 69 in landing pages
Segment leader
30%
Unbounce
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 26 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on systeme.io
6,163
subdomains included
Content
1,123
counted in the table below
Documentation
372
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 737 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | SEO, Ecommerce | |
| Comparison | 251 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 63 | undated | |||
| Case study | 26 | 2 | 2026-07-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 24 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 11 | undated | |||
| News or press | 5 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Landing page copy with ai blog
- 2026-09-11How to build a landing page with claude ai and systemeio blog
- 2026-09-0710 best ai tools for solo business owners in 2026 compared priced blog
- 2026-09-03Alicia visser psychology migration success blog
- 2026-09-03Tanja diamond migration success blog
- 2026-09-02Nicole anne photography migration success blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page systeme.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Systeme.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Systeme.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
Systeme 1
Follow Systeme.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Systeme.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Systeme.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The only tool you need to launch your online business
- For
- entrepreneurs
- Price stated
- Free, Startup, Webinar, Unlimited systeme.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 systeme.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free forever; No credit card required systeme.io
- Integrations claimed
- 15 systeme.io/pricing
- Customers named
- Doris SDarina K
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Systeme.io's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: systeme.io, systeme.io/pricing, systeme.io/sk/features/old. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Systeme.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Systeme.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Systeme.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Systeme.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Systeme.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.