Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 17% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 54
2 categories · RankedUnbounce
178Judge labels
32First choices
40Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
30% in Landing pages for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 69 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
10 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 61 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Unbounce →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 55
17%53 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 69
30%61 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise6 of 74
4%53 labels
accepted challenger
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Unbounce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 30% | 1 of 69 | 23% | 61 | accepted challenger | ▲+4Since September 2026: 28% → 32%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 54 of 71 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Unbounce held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Landing pages · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 28% → 32%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
32%from 28% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 66, unchanged
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 6 of 71
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages | 28% | 32% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 28% → 32%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 69, unchanged |
| Experimentation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 54 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Unbounce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Unbounce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels15
Paraphrase30 labels11
Comparative42 labels18not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labelsNone
Scale-constrained20 labels6
Negative34 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative178 labels in all, every segment counted; 32 of the 52 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for conversion optimization and teams running paid traffic... known for delivering up to 30% conversion lift for mid-market and enterprise teams” Mistral Small · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice
“my default pick is Unbounce if you want the best balance of conversion-focused features, flexibility, and mature marketing workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Unbounce or Instapage if you have a significant ad budget and need to wring every drop of ROI out of your paid traffic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · first choice
“For better options, consider builders like Unbounce, Landingi, or Swipe Pages, which generally receive higher user ratings.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Terrible landing page making experience. Every competitor is better than Unbounce and cheaper now too."; "one of the more expensive landing page builders"; billing issues and poor support” Muse Glimmer 30B · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid unless you need their specific AI Smart Traffic routing and can absorb the high cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium tools like Unbounce or Leadpages if your budget is strictly limited.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · budget prompt · hard negative
“When to Avoid: If you need flexible design, fast pages, or responsive help.” Grok 4.20 · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Unbounce, over the 178 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unbounce was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Unbounce, over the 178 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unbounce was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Unbounce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 163 of the 178 answers that named Unbounce and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
perspective.co75
zoho.com73
leadpages.com64
instapage.com58
unbounce.comYour site54
g2.com52
prismic.io50
guideflow.com47
forbes.com42
bitrix24.com41
502 of the 556 domain citations in answers naming Unbounce came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Unbounce stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Unbounce stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “landing page builder”
2
Position for “best landing page builder”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“unbounce”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 135 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 57,782 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,824 · 744 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 25,114
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
30%
rank 1 of 69 in landing pages
First choices
32
across its categories
- Named in
- 178 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 163 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on unbounce.com
1,796
subdomains included
Content
250
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
19 · 28
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Podcast or video | 51 | undated | |||
| Case study | 45 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 36 | 0 | 2025-05-29 | ||
| News or press | 27 | 0 | 2024-08-29 | ||
| Blog | 21 | 0 | 2025-05-13 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 20 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 17 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2022-08-09 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2025-02-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2024-06-14 |
Most recent
- 2025-05-29Ebook landing page examples report or ebook
- 2025-05-13How to create a landing page blog
- 2025-03-04Implementation services add ons blog
- 2025-03-04Average conversion rates landing pages blog
- 2025-02-23Go to market solutions blog
- 2025-02-21What is ab testing glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page unbounce.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Unbounce
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Unbounce.ShowHide
The company
Unbounce.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- unbounce.com
- Headquarters
- Vancouver, Canada
- Founded
- 2009
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered landing page builder for marketers and agencies.
- For
- marketers and agencies
- Price stated
- Monthly / Yearly; Starter $29 / $22, Build $99 / $74, Experiment $149 / $112, Optimize $249 / $187, Concierge Let’s talk!, Agency Let’s talk! unbounce.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 29 unbounce.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free 14-day trial unbounce.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1000 unbounce.com/pricing
- Certifications
- PCI Level 4 MerchantSAQ A-EP requirementsLevel 1 PCI-DSS compliant payment processorSOC 2 Type 1 certifiedGDPR
- Hosting
- multiple countriesCaliforniaNorthern VirginiaIrelandSingaporeFrankfurt
- Customers named
- SalesforceHubspotZapierClaudeChatGPTGoogle AnalyticsCallRailMailchimp
What Unbounce's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: unbounce.com, unbounce.com/pricing, unbounce.com/security, unbounce.com/product/security, unbounce.com/landing-page-optimization/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unbounce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unbounce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Unbounce by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Unbounce is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Unbounce, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Unbounce is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Unbounce is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Unbounce first in Landing pages and interactive content this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.