| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 28% | 1 of 78 | 13% | 55 | accepted challenger |
| Experimentation and personalization | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 69 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Unbounce or Instapage if you are running Google/Meta Ads and need AI-optimized pages that maximize every ad dollar.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · comparative prompt · first choice
“Unbounce is the strongest choice for mid-sized B2B companies running paid ads and targeted inbound campaigns.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Unbounce ... the industry standard for mid-sized B2B companies running paid acquisition campaigns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recommended Landing Page Builder: Unbounce Best overall choice for mid-sized B2B companies” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid for billing/reputation: Unbounce (especially on price)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Avoid at all costs" - multiple user warnings” Mistral Small · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“expensive pricing and no free plan can be risky if you are still testing demand; Unbounce and Instapage are repeatedly described this way” Perplexity Sonar · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with established builders like Unbounce and Leadpages due to widespread billing and support complaints” Grok 4.1 Fast · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 171 answers that named Unbounce and are not a share of its labels.
113 of the 128 domain citations in answers naming Unbounce came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unbounce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unbounce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at unbounce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.