Every category where a model named Landingi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Landing pages and interactive content	Marketing	7%	6 of 78	11%	28	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Landingi yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Landingi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	0	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	5	0	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labels2

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative21 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels7

Scale-constrained8 labels2

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Carrd (free) or Landingi (free plan + affordable paid tiers) offer the best combination of features and value” Kimi K2 · Landing pages · budget prompt · first choice

“The best landing page builder for a mid-market B2B company is Landingi” Llama 4 Maverick · Landing pages · direct prompt · first choice

“My top pick for most small businesses: Landingi at $29/month” Mistral Small · Landing pages · budget prompt · first choice

“Landingi in SSO/automation at scale” Grok 4.1 Fast · Landing pages · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be Cautious With These Builders ... Landingi ... Friction points to watch” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative

“Page editor can be slow, mobile editor problematic” Mistral Small · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative

“BE CAUTIOUS: Landingi ... Billing practices” Kimi K2 · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Landingi, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Landingi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Leadpages64 of 7417Not in the top three

Unbounce59 of 7411Not in the top three

Instapage49 of 7411Not in the top three

Carrd45 of 749Not in the top three

HubSpot Landing Pages36 of 743Not in the top three

Swipe Pages27 of 740Not in the top three

Webflow21 of 740Not in the top three

MailerLite20 of 743Not in the top three

ClickFunnels12 of 740Not in the top three

GetResponse9 of 740Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Landingi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 74 answers that named Landingi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

perspective.co6

prismic.io5

ventureharbour.com5

emailvendorselection.com4

fitsmallbusiness.com4

softr.io4

websiteplanet.com4

zapier.com4

blog.hubspot.com3

clickfunnels.com3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Landingi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

perspective.co/article/best-landing-page-builder6

prismic.io/blog/the-12-best-landing-page-builders-detailed-comparison5

ventureharbour.com/best-landing-page-builders5

emailvendorselection.com/best-landing-page-builders4

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-landing-page-builders4

softr.io/blog/best-landing-page-builder4

websiteplanet.com/landing-page-creators4

zapier.com/blog/best-landing-page-builders4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Landingi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Landingi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at landingi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.