AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Zoho LandingPage · October 2026 Edition
Zoho · 1 category · Ranked

Zoho LandingPage

21Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Landing pages for small business buyers
Rank 54 of 69 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho LandingPage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Landing pages and interactive contentMarketing0%54 of 6940%5under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Zoho LandingPage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Landing pages · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 23 of 54
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 of 66, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 19 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Landing pages0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 54 of 69, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Zoho LandingPage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best "Middle Ground" (No Code + CRM): Zoho LandingPage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Landing pages · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Steep pricing with add-ons; limited templates/customization/integrations; bugs, poor mobile performance” Grok 4.20 · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Caution \u2014 especially if you need mobile-first design or quick support.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho LandingPage, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho LandingPage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Unbounce17 of 215Not among the top eight
Instapage14 of 214Not among the top eight
Leadpages13 of 215Not among the top eight
Landingi10 of 210Not among the top eight
Carrd8 of 211Not among the top eight
HubSpot Landing Pages8 of 211Not among the top eight
MailerLite5 of 212Not among the top eight
Webflow5 of 210Not among the top eight
Wix4 of 210Not among the top eight
Systeme.io2 of 212Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho LandingPage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Zoho LandingPage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zoho.comYour site14
g2.com9
leadpages.com9
guideflow.com8
involve.me8
perspective.co8
ventureharbour.com8
prismic.io7
zapier.com7
blog.hubspot.com6

Seventy of the eighty-four domain citations in answers naming Zoho LandingPage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Zoho LandingPage stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
480 a month (“zoho landingpage”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
It sits on Zoho's site (zoho.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 54 of 69 in landing pages
Segment leader
30%
Unbounce
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
21 answers
Its own site cited
in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Zoho LandingPage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Zoho is the company behind Zoho LandingPage.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A powerful landing page builder that helps you create high-converting pages quickly using easy-to-use tools.
Free plan or trial
free 14-day trial zoho.com/landingpage
Integrations claimed
11 zoho.com/landingpage
Customers named
Tech Mahindra LimitedCamali ClinicUnivers VitalBrealant LimitedSVT Advisors Pvt. Ltd.Interiman Group
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting

What Zoho LandingPage's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zoho.com/landingpage, zoho.com/landingpage/solutions, zoho.com/landingpage/templates, zoho.com/landingpage/landing-page-builder, zoho.com/landingpage/free-landing-page-builder.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho LandingPage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho LandingPage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Zoho LandingPage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Zoho LandingPage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Zoho LandingPage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.