AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sitecore · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Sitecore

34Judge labels
0First choices
11Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Content marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 108 of 135 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sitecore for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%108 of 13540%5under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Ecommerce search and merchandisingMarketing0%49 of 740%1under 10 labels · led by Algolia at 25%
Marketing resource managementMarketing0%81 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%
Website governance and accessibilityMarketing0%84 of 980%1under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25%

Movement

Since September 2026, Sitecore held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Content marketing · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 134 → 103 of 120
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 of 134, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 32 → 24 of 111

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Content marketing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 108 of 135, unchanged
Ecommerce search0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 49 of 74, unchanged
Marketing resource mgt0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 81 of 110, unchanged
Website governance0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 84 of 98, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Sitecore across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative14 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative11 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise CMS with marketing automation, personalization, omnichannel” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution level: Medium-High ... complexity and customer experience issues ... overkill for SMBs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sitecore lost Leader status. Sitecore slipped from Leader to Visionary in 2025.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sitecore, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sitecore was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Optimizely CMS16 of 343Not among the top eight
Adobe Experience Manager12 of 342Not among the top eight
Contently10 of 341Not among the top eight
Skyword10 of 340Not among the top eight
HubSpot Content Hub8 of 341Not among the top eight
Acquia8 of 340Not among the top eight
Contentful8 of 340Not among the top eight
Bynder7 of 340Not among the top eight
Lytho7 of 340Not among the top eight
Aprimo6 of 341Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sitecore. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 34 answers that named Sitecore and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

sitecore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sitecore takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Content Hub takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best content marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“sitecore”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
759 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 32,655 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,632 · 519 in the top three
Sites linking to it
9,486
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 16 clicks and $109 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
42 ads · 29 text, 7 image, 6 video · 31 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as SITECORE IRELAND LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 9 in the year, 33 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 108 of 135 in content marketing
Segment leader
33%
HubSpot Content Hub
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
34 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sitecore.com
6,319
subdomains included
Content
817
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
90 · 403
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog409142026-09-28CDP, DAM
Case study12032026-09-04
News or press11432026-08-01DAM, CDP
Glossary or explainer8612026-08-21Content marketing, ABM
Webinar or virtual event5892026-11-01DAM, SEO
Comparison1402026-04-02CDP, CRM
Report or ebook1202026-03-30DAM
Conference or event202023-08-02
Template or tool200001-01-01

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sitecore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name DAM (16); 4 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Sitecore

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sitecore; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sitecore (Content Hub) 1

Follow Sitecore

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sitecore is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
a leading content and digital experience platform that connects CMS, DAM and AI-search visibility
For
digital leaders and marketing teams
Price stated
no add-ons or per-token fees sitecore.com
Free plan or trial
get your free AI visibility snapshot sitecore.com
Certifications
Sitecore developer certification
Hosting
Worldwide
Customers named
ENMAXShriners Children’sGoTo TechnologiesAFLAtkoreHexagonTravel MoneyBOK Financial
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Sitecore's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: sitecore.com, trust.sitecore.com, sitecore.com/platform, sitecore.com/solutions/customers, sitecore.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sitecore's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sitecore, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sitecore by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sitecore is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sitecore, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sitecore.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.