| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 17 of 68 | 11% | 18 | accepted challenger |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 63 of 108 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Adobe Experience Manager or Aprimo if you are a massive, global brand” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most comprehensive - Only platform with persistent AI agents across 5 categories” Kimi K2 · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Aprimo is highlighted as the best DAM for enterprise organizations in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“well-regarded alternatives in the mid-market space include Aprimo (strong for regulated industries)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“without the astronomical pricing ($100k–$200k+ per year) and heavy IT overhead of enterprise behemoths like Adobe Experience Manager or Aprimo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · direct prompt · soft negative
“heavyweight enterprise giants like Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) or Aprimo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 88 answers that named Aprimo and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-eight of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Aprimo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aprimo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aprimo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aprimo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.