GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Aprimo · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Aprimo

88Judge labels
16First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
24% in DAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 68 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 18 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aprimo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Digital asset managementMarketing0%17 of 6811%18accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%63 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aprimo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aprimo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash10023
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash03104
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels2
Paraphrase17 labels12
Comparative30 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labels2
Negative13 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Adobe Experience Manager or Aprimo if you are a massive, global brand” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Most comprehensive - Only platform with persistent AI agents across 5 categories” Kimi K2 · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Aprimo is highlighted as the best DAM for enterprise organizations in 2026” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“well-regarded alternatives in the mid-market space include Aprimo (strong for regulated industries)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“without the astronomical pricing ($100k–$200k+ per year) and heavy IT overhead of enterprise behemoths like Adobe Experience Manager or Aprimo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · direct prompt · soft negative
“heavyweight enterprise giants like Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) or Aprimo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aprimo, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aprimo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bynder67 of 889Not in the top three
Adobe Experience Manager Assets55 of 882Not in the top three
Brandfolder47 of 881Not in the top three
Canto41 of 885Not in the top three
Acquia DAM41 of 881Not in the top three
MediaValet38 of 885Not in the top three
Orange Logic32 of 880Not in the top three
Frontify29 of 880Not in the top three
Cloudinary26 of 880Not in the top three
Filecamp21 of 882Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aprimo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 88 answers that named Aprimo and are not a share of its labels.

The company

Aprimo.
Website
aprimo.com
Headquarters
Chicago, United States
Founded
1998

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aprimo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aprimo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aprimo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.