Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 → 59 of 59
Adobe · 1 category · RankedAdobe Experience Manager Assets
113Judge labels
6First choices
46Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in DAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 67 of 70 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 47% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Adobe Experience Manager Assets →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business67 of 67
0%17 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market67 of 70
0%30 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise3 of 56
13%61 labels
accepted challenger
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adobe Experience Manager Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 67 of 70 | 47% | 30 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adobe Experience Manager Assets held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DAM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 65 → 57 of 63
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 10% → 13%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 52
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 65 → 67 of 70 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adobe Experience Manager Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adobe Experience Manager Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase21 labels4
Comparative30 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained14 labelsNone
Negative24 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative113 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise organizations often favor Bynder or Adobe Experience Manager” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for large enterprise content ops: Adobe Experience Manager Assets.” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Adobe Experience Manager if you are a massive global enterprise heavily dependent on Adobe products.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative
“if your company is already deep in the Adobe ecosystem and needs a highly scalable, more advanced DAM” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if: you're a mid-sized company, use diverse tools, or need fast implementation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid overly complex enterprise systems (like basic Adobe implementations)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · direct prompt · hard negative
“scrutinize it if you need a simple, low-maintenance library or lack technical and admin capacity... G2 reviewers flag cost, complexity, and a steep learning curve” GPT-6 Luna · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“you aren't yet a massive global conglomerate that needs a highly customized, multi-million-dollar enterprise legacy DAM (like Adobe Experience Manager)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Experience Manager Assets, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Experience Manager Assets was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Experience Manager Assets, over the 113 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Experience Manager Assets was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Experience Manager Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 104 of the 113 answers that named Adobe Experience Manager Assets and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
vntana.com48
templafy.com44
canto.com43
zapier.com43
cmswire.com42
cloudinary.com38
g2.com35
getmasset.com35
air.inc34
aprimo.com31
393 of the 393 domain citations in answers naming Adobe Experience Manager Assets came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Adobe Experience Manager Assets stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Adobe Experience Manager Assets stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“adobe experience manager assets”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Adobe's site (adobe.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 67 of 70 in DAM
Segment leader
45%
Canto
- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 113 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 104 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Experience Manager Assets; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets 10Adobe Experience Manager 6Adobe 3Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) 1Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets / Adobe DAM 1
Follow Adobe Experience Manager Assets
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Experience Manager Assets.ShowHide
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Experience Manager Assets.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- adobe.com
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Founded
- 1982
- Employees
- about 25,988 (2021)
- Ownership
- Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- null
- Price stated
- null developer.adobe.com/experience-manager
- Starting price
- null developer.adobe.com/experience-manager
- Free plan or trial
- null developer.adobe.com/experience-manager
- Certifications
- Adobe Certification
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What Adobe Experience Manager Assets's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: developer.adobe.com/experience-manager, helpx.adobe.com/robohelp/using/publish-adobe-experience-manager.html, helpx.adobe.com/framemaker/tutorials/improved-adobe-experience-manager-connector-video.html, helpx.adobe.com/stock/web/adobe-stock-asset-collections/3d-assets.html, helpx.adobe.com/stock/web/adobe-stock-asset-collections/design-assets.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Experience Manager Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Experience Manager Assets by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe Experience Manager Assets is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Experience Manager Assets, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.