GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Orange Logic · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Orange Logic

33Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in DAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 68 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Orange Logic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Digital asset managementMarketing0%21 of 680%8under 10 labels · led by Canto at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orange Logic yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orange Logic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative18 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Driven by "agentic content orchestration", Orange Logic lets administrators deeply customize every workflow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Both are enterprise-grade, governance-heavy platforms suited to complex rights management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orange Logic, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orange Logic was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aprimo32 of 3312Not in the top three
Bynder31 of 3314Not in the top three
Adobe Experience Manager Assets28 of 334Not in the top three
Brandfolder22 of 330Not in the top three
Acquia DAM19 of 331Not in the top three
MediaValet18 of 330Not in the top three
Canto17 of 330Not in the top three
Frontify14 of 330Not in the top three
Cloudinary13 of 330Not in the top three
Filecamp9 of 331Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orange Logic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 33 answers that named Orange Logic and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orange Logic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orange Logic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orangelogic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack