Every category where a model named MediaValet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	14 of 68	4%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MediaValet yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MediaValet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	0	0	3
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	1	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels7

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best when you need enterprise-grade reliability and security without the complexity of a larger enterprise stack” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · direct prompt · alternative

“MediaValet if you need unlimited users and broader enterprise-style governance.” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“MediaValet is a strong option if video is central to your needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · direct prompt · alternative

“Best Value for Larger Teams ... Canto and MediaValet lead the pack” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Pricing transparency issues (costly storage fees) - Slow loading and crashes with large files” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MediaValet, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MediaValet was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bynder52 of 5812Not in the top three

Brandfolder47 of 580Not in the top three

Canto43 of 589Not in the top three

Aprimo38 of 5810Not in the top three

Acquia DAM35 of 581Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager Assets33 of 582Not in the top three

Frontify31 of 580Not in the top three

Air22 of 584Not in the top three

Filecamp22 of 583Not in the top three

Cloudinary20 of 580Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MediaValet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 58 answers that named MediaValet and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

canto.com8

cmswire.com7

frontify.com7

celum.com6

getmasset.com6

vntana.com6

stockpress.co5

thedigitalprojectmanager.com5

aprimo.com4

mediavalet.comYour site4

Fifty-four of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming MediaValet came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

canto.com/blog/top-dam-software8

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu7

frontify.com/en/guide/digital-asset-management-software7

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems6

getmasset.com/digital-asset-management-software6

stockpress.co/resources/10-resources-best-digital-asset-management-software-20265

mediavalet.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-platform4

vntana.com/roundup/best-digital-asset-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MediaValet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MediaValet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mediavalet.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.