Every category where a model named Air for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	18 of 68	12%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Air yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Air across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	4	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative20 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained18 labels4

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative60 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Air (free plan or $25/month) if you want: - AI-powered organization” Kimi K2 · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Air if your team is smaller within mid-market and wants fast adoption” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Air - $0/month free plan ... Unlimited users on free tier” Mistral Small · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Visual workspace, AI-driven organization, affordable” Kimi K2 · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Tools like Filecamp and Air can get expensive quickly if you require terabytes of video storage.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative

“usually not the cheapest option for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Air, over the 60 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Air was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Canto45 of 6014Not in the top three

Filecamp45 of 6013Not in the top three

Bynder40 of 602Not in the top three

Brandfolder35 of 601Not in the top three

Cloudinary24 of 600Not in the top three

Pics.io23 of 602Not in the top three

MediaValet22 of 602Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager Assets21 of 600Not in the top three

Dash19 of 603Not in the top three

Aprimo19 of 601Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Air. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 60 answers that named Air and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

canto.com6

celum.com5

frontify.com5

stockpress.co5

thedigitalprojectmanager.com5

brandfolder.com4

getmasset.com4

cmswire.com3

flowcase.com3

g2.com3

No domain is on file for Air, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

canto.com/blog/top-dam-software6

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems5

frontify.com/en/guide/digital-asset-management-software5

getmasset.com/digital-asset-management-software4

stockpress.co/resources/10-resources-best-digital-asset-management-software-20264

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/digital-asset-management-software4

brandfolder.com/resources/top-rated-digital-asset-management-software-products3

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Air

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Air; a claim can dispute any of them.

AIR 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Air's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Air, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.