AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Air · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Air

63Judge labels
5First choices
6Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in DAM for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Air →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Air for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital asset managementMarketing2%8 of 7020%15accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Air held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DAM · by segment

Small business▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 4 → 3 of 59
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 18 → 7 of 63
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 3%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 52

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DAM0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 18 → 8 of 70

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Air across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.2002013
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.511002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase9 labelsNone
Comparative15 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels4
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative5 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Canto or Air (both offer modern UIs and decent automation)” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Modern interface, strong creative team features, pricing around $500/month minimum” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · scale prompt · alternative
“Air is another strong contender, especially for creative teams” Mistral Small · DAM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for easy adoption by marketing teams: Canto or Air.” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Air, but it is described as cheaper while also being lighter on core DAM features” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“consider Dash or Air, but they're typically pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Affordable entry; less feature-rich for growing B2B.” Grok 4.20 · DAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Air, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Air was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MediaValet19 of 633Not among the top eight
Cloudinary19 of 630Not among the top eight
Adobe Experience Manager Assets14 of 631Not among the top eight
Dash11 of 633Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Air. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 63 answers that named Air and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

canto.com42
zapier.com34
air.incYour site33
filecamp.com27
templafy.com25
cloudinary.com24
g2.com24
dupple.com21
frontify.com20
thedigitalprojectmanager.com20

237 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Air came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

air.inc is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Air takes 2% of first choices and Canto takes 45%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “digital asset management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital asset management system”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“air”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,766,606 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 27,643 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,488 · 101 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,037
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 8 clicks and $1,275 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
62 ads · 52 text, 10 video · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2022, as Air Labs Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 34 in the year, 28 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 70 in DAM
Segment leader
45%
Canto
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
63 answers
Its own site cited
in 62 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on air.inc
657
subdomains included
Content
155
counted in the table below
Documentation
354
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog85152026-09-25DAM
Comparison4152026-08-19DAM
Case study1602026-05-11
Report or ebook10undated
Glossary or explainer212026-09-16DAM
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page air.inc exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Air

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Air is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Your agent for creative tasks
For
teams
Price stated
Business $900 per month billed annually; Enterprise Custom air.inc/pricing
Starting price
900 air.inc/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start for free air.inc
Certifications
SOC 2 Type II
Customers named
SmallsHydrowThe Infatuation
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Air's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: air.inc, air.inc/pricing, trust.air.inc, air.inc/features/storing-sharing, air.inc/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Air's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Air, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Air by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Air is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Air, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at air.inc is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.