Every category where a model named Pics.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	19 of 68	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pics.io yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pics.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pics.io is a cost-effective DAM solution that uses Google Drive and Amazon S3 to store your files” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Pics.io - $50/month ... Google Drive/Amazon S3 integration” Mistral Small · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Go with Pics.io if your team is already using Google Drive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Pics.io acts as a "smart layer" on top of it” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pics.io, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pics.io was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Filecamp28 of 3112Not in the top three

Air23 of 313Not in the top three

Canto20 of 317Not in the top three

Bynder15 of 312Not in the top three

Brandfolder15 of 310Not in the top three

Dash14 of 312Not in the top three

Stockpress11 of 312Not in the top three

Cloudinary11 of 310Not in the top three

Frontify8 of 310Not in the top three

ResourceSpace8 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pics.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 31 answers that named Pics.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

celum.com4

mediavalet.com3

stockpress.co3

thedigitalprojectmanager.com3

brault.app2

cmswire.com2

daminion.net2

lingoapp.com2

research.com2

vntana.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Pics.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems4

mediavalet.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-platform3

brault.app/blog/digital-asset-management/best-digital-asset-management-software2

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-digital-asset-management-software-for-small-busine2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/digital-asset-management-software2

vntana.com/roundup/best-digital-asset-management-software2

alternativeto.net/software/open-source-alternatives/about1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pics.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pics.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at picsio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.