Every category where a model named ResourceSpace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	4%	7 of 68	33%	9	under 10 labels · led by Canto at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ResourceSpace yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ResourceSpace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained12 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best digital asset management system for a company with a limited budget is ResourceSpace, as it is considered the top pick” Llama 4 Maverick · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“For small teams (1-10 users): Start with ResourceSpace free tier or Razuna free cloud to test functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Open-Source/Free Self-Hosted ... Requires IT skills for setup/upgrades” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

“Go with ResourceSpace if you have an IT department or developer on hand” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“excellent option for budget-conscious organizations... However, while open-source DAM software... lacks some functionality and flexibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · budget prompt · soft negative

“Open-source platforms like self-hosted versions of ResourceSpace or Pimcore, unless you have dedicated in-house web developers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

“TECHNICAL CAUTION ... Only suitable if: You have dedicated server administrators” Kimi K2 · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ResourceSpace, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ResourceSpace was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Filecamp17 of 2310Not in the top three

Canto15 of 235Not in the top three

Bynder15 of 230Not in the top three

Air12 of 233Not in the top three

Brandfolder9 of 230Not in the top three

Cloudinary8 of 231Not in the top three

Pics.io8 of 230Not in the top three

Dash7 of 231Not in the top three

Daminion6 of 230Not in the top three

Brault5 of 232Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ResourceSpace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 23 answers that named ResourceSpace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

celum.com3

g2.com3

mediavalet.com3

vntana.com3

blog.hubspot.com2

brault.app2

canto.com2

daminion.net2

stockpress.co2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming ResourceSpace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems3

mediavalet.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-platform3

vntana.com/roundup/best-digital-asset-management-software3

blog.hubspot.com/website/digital-asset-management2

brault.app/blog/digital-asset-management/best-digital-asset-management-software2

g2.com/categories/digital-asset-management/small-business2

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/digital-asset-management-software2

alternativeto.net/software/open-source-alternatives/about1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ResourceSpace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ResourceSpace; a claim can dispute any of them.

ResourceSpace (Open Source) 1

The company

ResourceSpace.

Website: resourcespace.com

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ResourceSpace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ResourceSpace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at resourcespace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.