Every category where a model named Filecamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	19%	2 of 68	4%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Filecamp yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Filecamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	1	1	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative18 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels19

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative72 labels in all, every segment counted; 22 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall value: Filecamp at $29/month offers the best balance of affordability, unlimited users, and core DAM features” Mistral Small · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Go with Filecamp if you are on a shoestring budget ($29/mo) and need to share assets with a high volume of external clients.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Need quick, user-friendly setup for 5-50+ people? Filecamp Basic\u2014highest value per reviews.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Budget Option ... Start with Filecamp at $29/month—it's the lowest-cost reputable DAM” MiniMax M2.5 · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited reporting features... No mobile apps (web-only access)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Filecamp, over the 72 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Filecamp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Canto46 of 7211Compare →

Air45 of 723Not in the top three

Bynder37 of 721Compare →

Brandfolder33 of 720Not in the top three

Pics.io28 of 721Not in the top three

Dash24 of 722Not in the top three

MediaValet22 of 722Not in the top three

Cloudinary22 of 720Not in the top three

Aprimo21 of 721Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Manager Assets21 of 720Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Filecamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 72 answers that named Filecamp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brandfolder.com6

canto.com6

celum.com6

thedigitalprojectmanager.com6

daminion.net5

frontify.com5

zapier.com5

cmswire.com4

dash.app4

fast.io4

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Filecamp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

canto.com/blog/top-dam-software6

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems6

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-digital-asset-management-software-for-small-busine6

brandfolder.com/resources/digital-asset-management-for-small-business5

frontify.com/en/guide/digital-asset-management-software5

zapier.com/blog/dam-software5

brandfolder.com/resources/top-rated-digital-asset-management-software-products4

cmswire.com/digital-asset-management/examining-19-enterprise-digital-asset-management-solu4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Filecamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Filecamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at filecamp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.