Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
30%from 27% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 59, unchanged
2 categories · RankedFilecamp
74Judge labels
26First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
33% in DAM for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Filecamp →By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
Small business1 of 67
33%45 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market2 of 70
17%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise52 of 56
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Filecamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 17% | 2 of 70 | 5% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 0% | 94 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Filecamp held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DAM · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 of 63, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 34 of 52
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAM | 19% | 17% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 70, unchanged |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 94 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Filecamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Filecamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels6
Paraphrase11 labels3
Comparative14 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels17
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 26 of the 32 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most companies with a limited budget, Filecamp at $29/month offers the best balance of affordability, features, and ease of use.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Filecamp is the strongest overall choice if you want a low-cost, easy-to-use digital asset management system” Perplexity Sonar · DAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value & Custom Branding: Filecamp ... widely considered one of the most budget-friendly options” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Filecamp - offers unlimited users on all plans, making it a budget-friendly option for teams of all sizes.” Llama 4 Maverick · DAM · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Layout issues have been reported, the general experience of its mobile application is less efficient, and this software offers very few integrations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · soft negative
“Affordable entry; less feature-rich for growing B2B.” Grok 4.20 · DAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Filecamp, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Filecamp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Filecamp, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Filecamp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Filecamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 72 of the 74 answers that named Filecamp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
canto.com47
zapier.com40
thedigitalprojectmanager.com37
filecamp.comYour site34
dash.app33
g2.com29
frontify.com27
templafy.com27
fast.io23
capterra.com21
284 of the 318 domain citations in answers naming Filecamp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
filecamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Filecamp takes 17% of first choices and Canto takes 45%.ShowHide
Search and answers
filecamp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Filecamp takes 17% of first choices and Canto takes 45%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital asset management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best digital asset management system”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“filecamp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 11,252 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,078 · 111 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,177
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
17%
rank 2 of 70 in DAM
Segment leader
45%
Canto
- First choices
- 26 across its categories
- Named in
- 74 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 72 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on filecamp.com
271
subdomains included
Content
125
counted in the table below
Documentation
85
Product · Integration
9 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 98 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | DAM, SEO | |
| Comparison | 18 | 0 | 2024-04-07 | DAM | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2016-11-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2025-02-20 | DAM |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Adobe experience manager pricing blog
- 2026-08-12How to build and manage your own stock image library blog
- 2026-08-11Digital asset management pricing blog
- 2026-05-27Ai in digital asset management blog
- 2025-11-17Semi secret filecamp features blog
- 2025-08-25Organized image library for your business blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page filecamp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Filecamp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Filecamp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Filecamp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Digital Asset Management Software
- For
- marketing professionals
- Price stated
- Prices start at USD29/month. filecamp.com/pricing-plans
- Starting price
- 29 filecamp.com/pricing-plans
- Free plan or trial
- Try it free for 30 days filecamp.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Filecamp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: filecamp.com, filecamp.com/pricing-plans, filecamp.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Filecamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Filecamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Filecamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Filecamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Filecamp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Filecamp is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Filecamp is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideFilecamp is among the products AI models recommend first in Digital asset management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.