| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 2% | 17 of 113 | 29% | 17 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 0% | 68 of 109 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid ads | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 17 of 113 |
| Creative automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 68 of 109, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Known-good SaaS platforms like Optmyzr, AdEspresso, or Shape” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value & Ease of Use: AdEspresso (by Hootsuite)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice
“Easiest entry point for Meta ad testing that requires minimal training” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative
“good for social-heavy but limited spend caps on basic plan” Grok 4.20 · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“persistent user complaints about bulk-upload features in AdEspresso triggering automated flags or suspensions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“AdEspresso's Google Ads features feel like an afterthought... it's cheap, but you get what you pay for.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Paid ads · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best for *beginners* only; problematic for scaling businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
“May be too lightweight for 500-person needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 48 answers that named AdEspresso and are not a share of its labels.
200 of the 200 domain citations in answers naming AdEspresso came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 376 | 0 | 2022-10-26 | SEO, Social media | |
| Report or ebook | 319 | 0 | 2023-01-02 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 54 | 0 | 2018-03-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 20 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 7 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page adespresso.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What AdEspresso's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: adespresso.com, adespresso.com/pricing, adespresso.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AdEspresso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AdEspresso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AdEspresso by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: