GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Adzooma · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Adzooma

33Judge labels
9First choices
3Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Paid ads for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 137 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In paid ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Adzooma for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing9%4 of 1378%12accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adzooma yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adzooma across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast11002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels7
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Adzooma (Best Free & Low-Cost Cross-Platform Dashboard)... highly popular because of its generous free tier” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Adzooma as the top starting point for PPC and paid social campaign management.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Adzooma is the best budget-first option because it has a free-forever tier” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice
“For a truly limited budget, start with Adzooma's free tier.” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Pricing concerns: Often too expensive relative to its capabilities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adzooma, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adzooma was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Optmyzr26 of 333Not in the top three
AdEspresso18 of 331Not in the top three
WordStream18 of 330Not in the top three
Google Ads16 of 331Not in the top three
Opteo14 of 332Not in the top three
Skai14 of 332Not in the top three
Marin Software13 of 331Not in the top three
Meta Ads12 of 332Not in the top three
Madgicx11 of 331Not in the top three
Adalysis10 of 331Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adzooma. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 33 answers that named Adzooma and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adventuremedia.ai2
madgicx.com2
wifitalents.com2
adcontrolcenter.com1
adstellar.ai1
almcorp.com1
blog.wask.co1
brafton.com1
buffer.com1
clicksgeek.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Adzooma came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adzooma's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adzooma, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adzooma.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.