GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Ryze AI · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Ryze AI

19Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Paid ads for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ryze AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel2%20 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing0%32 of 1370%6under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ryze AI yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ryze AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with native automation + a flat-priced autonomous manager (e.g., Ryze AI)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose AdEspresso, Bïrch, or Ryze AI if your work is more paid social or truly cross-channel.” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative
“Ryze AI offers the best value with its flat $89/month pricing” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative
“top-rated but newer\u2014best if you want hands-off. Free trial.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ryze AI, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ryze AI was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Optmyzr12 of 192Not in the top three
Adzooma9 of 193Not in the top three
Google Ads9 of 191Not in the top three
Opteo9 of 191Not in the top three
Skai8 of 192Not in the top three
Madgicx8 of 191Not in the top three
WordStream8 of 191Not in the top three
AdEspresso8 of 190Not in the top three
Marin Software7 of 192Not in the top three
Meta Ads6 of 191Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ryze AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 19 answers that named Ryze AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.wask.co1
clicksgeek.com1
digitalsuccess.us1
g2.com1
get-ryze.ai1
guideflow.com1
hawksem.com1
reddit.com1
saleshive.com1
stackmatix.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Ryze AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ryze AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ryze AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ryze.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.