One of fourteen models named Google Ads first on the direct prompt; zero named Optmyzr. Google Ads was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Optmyzr by fourteen and Google Ads carries 30 labels and Optmyzr 43, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By Google, Mountain View, California, United States, founded 1998. Named in ten categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the search and social advertising platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Google Ads and Optmyzr were named in the same answer thirty-one times, of the 185 answers naming Google Ads and the 91 naming Optmyzr. In those answers Optmyzr took the first choice seven times and Google Ads seven.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Trustpilot shows significant dissatisfaction around misleading promotional credits, billing discrepancies, unexpected deductions, and unhelpful support.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Verdict: Essential but challenging; consider using a third-party management tool” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“the native platforms like Google Ads and Meta Ads Manager ... are often the best starting point—they're completely free to use” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“For PPC, Google Ads (particularly for branded and intent-based campaigns) is often considered the best overall solution.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“or Optmyzr ($200+/month) until your ad spend justifies the cost” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Many industry-leading platforms (like Optmyzr, Skai, or Smartly.io) cater to enterprise clients and cost hundreds of dollars a month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“powerful but start at ~$209–$299/month *plus* scale with your ad spend. They may be too expensive for very small budgets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Optmyzr is a management layer built on top of Google Ads, Microsoft Advertising, and Facebook that enables multi-account automation, bid management, and reporting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Optmyzr: PPC powerhouse; automation/rules for Google/Microsoft/Meta. Great for optimization-heavy teams (~$250/account/mo).” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need more comprehensive PPC coverage and have significant Google Ads spend, Optmyzr would be the better choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.