AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Teamwork.com · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Teamwork.com

52Judge labels
12First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Marketing resource mgt for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 110 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Teamwork.com →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Teamwork.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Marketing resource managementMarketing9%4 of 1100%22accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teamwork.com yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teamwork.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast03003
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B10203

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels7
Scale-constrained8 labels4
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a purpose-built MRM with budget tracking on a limited budget and <20 people, Teamwork.com is the most commonly cited fit.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-market sweet spot: Wrike, monday work management, Teamwork.com, Smartsheet” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · scale prompt · first choice
“For teams under 20 people with limited budget, Teamwork.com only is recommended” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · first choice
“the best all‑round, low‑cost MRM platform is Teamwork.com” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teamwork.com, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teamwork.com was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aprimo27 of 522Not among the top eight
Adobe Workfront16 of 521Not among the top eight
Trello12 of 520Not among the top eight
HubSpot Marketing Hub9 of 520Not among the top eight
Bynder8 of 520Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teamwork.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 52 answers that named Teamwork.com and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

teamwork.comYour site44
learn.g2.com43
g2.com32
thecmo.com31
soku.ai25
mailmodo.com22
clickup.com20
zendikt.com19
techdogs.com18
airtable.com15

225 of the 269 domain citations in answers naming Teamwork.com came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

teamwork.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teamwork.com takes 9% of first choices and Wrike for Marketing takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“teamwork.com”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
23 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 467,278 a month
Searches its site ranks for
15,272 · 1,520 in the top three
Sites linking to it
9,961
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
102 ads · 69 text, 24 video, 9 image · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Digital Crew Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 58 in the year, 44 before. 6 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 110 in marketing resource mgt
Segment leader
24%
Wrike for Marketing
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
52 answers
Its own site cited
in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on teamwork.com
3,209
subdomains included
Content
1,249
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,465
Product · Integration
37 · 66
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog642102026-09-25
Glossary or explainer15902024-09-11
Report or ebook13502024-07-25
Template or tool7902026-06-10
Case study6802025-07-11
Comparison5532026-09-25
Webinar or virtual event5212026-07-24
Podcast or video5202024-10-03
Conference or event602023-07-05
News or press102024-01-09

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page teamwork.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Teamwork.com

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teamwork.com; a claim can dispute any of them.
Teamwork 4

Follow Teamwork.com

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Teamwork.com is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered PSA software built for profitability; the agentic PSA that helps you win, plan and deliver projects, with live margin at every step.
For
professional services businesses
Price stated
Straightforward pricing, built for professional services: Basics €9.99 /user/month billed yearly; Accelerate €24.99 /user/month billed yearly; Optimize Custom pricing; Enterprise Custom pricing. teamwork.com
Starting price
9.99 teamwork.com
Free plan or trial
14 DAY TRIAL. NO CREDIT CARD REQUIRED teamwork.com
Integrations claimed
150 teamwork.com
Certifications
GDPRSOC 2ISO 27001SSOSSO standardsSOC 2 compliance
Hosting
USEU
Customers named
OIC advisorsCLC consultingSugarCRMThreeSixtyEightInvanityThe Brand LeaderBeyond the ChaosInvanity Marketing

What Teamwork.com's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: teamwork.com, teamwork.com, teamwork.com/pricing, trust.teamwork.com, teamwork.com/product. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teamwork.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teamwork.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teamwork.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Teamwork.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teamwork.com, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teamwork.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.