AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Uptempo · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Uptempo

48Judge labels
14First choices
14Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Marketing resource mgt for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 110 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 27% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Uptempo →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uptempo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Marketing resource managementMarketing7%5 of 11027%15criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uptempo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uptempo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash12014
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K210012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels3
Paraphrase16 labels11
Comparative5 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Uptempo is a dedicated marketing operations platform built specifically to bridge the gap between marketing plans, budgets, and actual financial results.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best *Marketing Resource Management (MRM)* platform is usually Uptempo if your priority is a true MRM suite” Perplexity Sonar · Marketing resource mgt · direct prompt · first choice
“HubSpot or Uptempo are excellent choices if you need comprehensive budgeting features alongside planning” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Uptempo (formerly Allocadia + BrandMaker)” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Significant Issues ... Uptempo - Steep learning curve ... Expensive” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · hard negative
“because it is the result of merging three entirely different software platforms, you should approach it with structured questions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · soft negative
“complaints about a clunky UI, expensive pricing, and some integration/training issues” GPT-5.4 mini · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically cost $75,000–$300,000+ per year and require 6–12 month implementations” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uptempo, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uptempo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Aprimo32 of 485Not among the top eight
Adobe Workfront24 of 483Not among the top eight
Bynder6 of 480Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uptempo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 48 answers that named Uptempo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com23
learn.g2.com21
uptempo.ioYour site21
teamwork.com18
soku.ai17
aprimo.com15
clickup.com15
thecmo.com15
monday.com14
capterra.com11

149 of the 170 domain citations in answers naming Uptempo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

uptempo.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Uptempo takes 7% of first choices and Wrike for Marketing takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing resource management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
9,900 a month (“uptempo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,872 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 5,750 a month
Searches its site ranks for
400 · 37 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,027
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 110 in marketing resource mgt
Segment leader
24%
Wrike for Marketing
First choices
14 across its categories
Named in
48 answers
Its own site cited
in 48 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on uptempo.io
522
subdomains included
Content
213
counted in the table below
Documentation
227
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog11402026-04-07
Webinar or virtual event2812026-08-09
Case study19undated
Report or ebook16undated
News or press1312026-07-22
Podcast or video10undated
Conference or event5undated
Comparison5undated
Glossary or explainer202021-08-17
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page uptempo.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Uptempo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Uptempo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Uptempo (formerly BrandMaker) 1

Follow Uptempo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uptempo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uptempo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uptempo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Uptempo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Uptempo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uptempo.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.