Every category where a model named Screendragon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	2%	11 of 110	11%	18	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Screendragon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Screendragon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	0	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels2

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Screendragon stands out as the best overall MRM platform due to its deep marketing-specific features” Mistral Small · Marketing resource mgt · direct prompt · first choice

“Screendragon is widely considered the gold standard for large enterprise marketing teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · first choice

“Screendragon if you have complex creative production workflows requiring advanced approval processes” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose ScreenDragon for AI-enhanced campaign planning, brief intake, approvals, and performance tracking” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“usually out of the question. These enterprise systems typically require complex, custom five-figure annual contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · budget prompt · soft negative

“Expensive and complex, but unbeatable if you struggle with creative bottlenecks and missed deadlines.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing resource mgt · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Screendragon, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Screendragon was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aprimo31 of 407Not among the top eight

Wrike for Marketing30 of 404Compare →

monday.com Work Management25 of 404Compare →

Asana20 of 403Compare →

Adobe Workfront16 of 405Not among the top eight

Uptempo9 of 402Compare →

ClickUp8 of 402Compare →

Smartsheet7 of 401Compare →

Teamwork.com7 of 401Compare →

Bynder7 of 400Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Screendragon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 40 answers that named Screendragon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com28

learn.g2.com26

mailmodo.com22

teamwork.com19

techdogs.com19

guideflow.com16

soku.ai16

gitnux.org14

thecmo.com14

thedigitalprojectmanager.com14

188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming Screendragon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/marketing-resource-management28

learn.g2.com/best-marketing-resource-management-software24

mailmodo.com/marketing-stash/marketing-resource-management-software22

teamwork.com/blog/marketing-resource-management18

soku.ai/blog/marketing-resource-management-software16

guideflow.com/blog/best-marketing-resource-management-software13

workwithopal.com/about/blog/best-marketing-resource-management-software13

techdogs.com/td-articles/product-mine/best-marketing-resource-management-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

screendragon.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Screendragon takes 2% of first choices and Wrike for Marketing takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “marketing resource management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best marketing resource management platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“screendragon”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,722 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 829 · 32 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,249
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

51 ads · 19 text, 17 video, 15 image · 39 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2025, as SCREENDRAGON LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 27 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 110 in marketing resource mgt

Segment leader

24%

Wrike for Marketing

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 40 answers
Its own site cited: in 40 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on screendragon.com

424

subdomains included

Content

342

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

23 · 6

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	206	3	2026-09-02
Podcast or video	46	0	2025-09-04
Webinar or virtual event	28	1	2026-08-10
Report or ebook	27	2	2026-08-11
Case study	18	0	2026-05-18
Conference or event	12	0	2026-02-18
Glossary or explainer	4	0	2025-07-15
Comparison	1	0	2026-01-23

Most recent

2026-09-02G2 awards screendragon explainer blog
2026-08-20Ai has arrived in marketing maturity hasnt blog
2026-08-11Enterprise guide to ai continuity report or ebook
2026-08-10Ai experiments are everywhere webinar or virtual event
2026-07-28Screendragon wins the 2026 henry stewart creative ops tech challenge blog
2026-07-15The state of ai in creative and content operations report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page screendragon.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Screendragon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Screendragon; a claim can dispute any of them.

ScreenDragon 2

Follow Screendragon

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Screendragon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Screendragon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Screendragon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Screendragon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Screendragon, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.