Marketing resource management · October 2026 Edition
Teamwork.com vs Screendragon
One of fourteen models named Teamwork.com first on the direct prompt; one named Screendragon. Teamwork.com was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Screendragon by ten and Teamwork.com carries 22 labels and Screendragon 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2218A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamwork.com reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Wrike for Marketing was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Wrike for Marketing vs Teamwork.com · Wrike for Marketing vs Screendragon · ClickUp vs Teamwork.com
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the marketing resource management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Teamwork.comFirst choices, of fourteen modelsScreendragon
Direct111 against Screendragon
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained301 against Screendragon
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamwork.com and Screendragon stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Teamwork.com Screendragon first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamwork.com on the left and Screendragon on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamwork.com and Screendragon stood in it.
Teamwork.com first, Screendragon not the choice
1 of 14 modelsScreendragon was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashSmartsheet, Teamwork.com alternatives: Uptempo
Screendragon first, Teamwork.com an alternative
1 of 14 modelsTeamwork.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallScreendragon alternatives: Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashWrike for Marketing alternatives: Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Screendragon, Uptempo, monday.com Work Management
Perplexity SonarUptempo alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Lytho, Teamwork.com, Wrike for Marketing, monday Work Management
Grok 4.1 FastWrike for Marketing alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashWrike for Marketing alternatives: Asana, ClickUp, Screendragon, monday.com Work Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXWrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management alternatives: Asana, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Screendragon
MiniMax M2.5Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Lytho, Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Asana, HubSpot Marketing Hub, monday.com Work Management
GPT-5.4 miniLytho alternatives: monday Work Management
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Bynder, monday.com Work Management
GPT-6 LunaWrike for Marketing alternatives: Adobe Workfront, Marmind
Muse Glimmer 30BFrontify alternatives: Bynder, Uptempo
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamwork.com leads by eleven points.
Teamwork.com11%#3 of 13Screendragon0%#– of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamwork.com leads by seven points.
Teamwork.com9%#4 of 11Screendragon2%#8 of 11Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teamwork.com2%#– of 10Screendragon2%#4 of 10What the models said about Teamwork.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you need a purpose-built MRM with budget tracking on a limited budget and <20 people, Teamwork.com is the most commonly cited fit.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“Mid-market sweet spot: Wrike, monday work management, Teamwork.com, Smartsheet” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“For teams under 20 people with limited budget, Teamwork.com only is recommended” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Screendragon
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“usually out of the question. These enterprise systems typically require complex, custom five-figure annual contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Expensive and complex, but unbeatable if you struggle with creative bottlenecks and missed deadlines.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Screendragon stands out as the best overall MRM platform due to its deep marketing-specific features” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Screendragon is widely considered the gold standard for large enterprise marketing teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Screendragon if you have complex creative production workflows requiring advanced approval processes” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Wrike for Marketing vs Teamwork.comWrike for Marketing vs ScreendragonClickUp vs Teamwork.comClickUp vs Screendragonmonday.com Work Management vs Teamwork.commonday.com Work Management vs ScreendragonTeamwork.com vs UptempoTeamwork.com vs AsanaTeamwork.com vs SmartsheetUptempo vs ScreendragonAsana vs ScreendragonSmartsheet vs ScreendragonAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full marketing resource mgt standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.