GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Bitrix24 · September 2026 Edition
8 categories · Ranked

Bitrix24

42Judge labels
3First choices
7Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
8Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bitrix24 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CPQRevenue operations4%5 of 730%6under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%
CRMRevenue operations0%16 of 7120%10accepted challenger
Lead routing and managementSales0%24 of 1040%2under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%
Territory and quota planningRevenue operations0%39 of 1030%2under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%41 of 1040%1under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%
Customer success platformsCustomer0%42 of 690%1under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39%
Sales coaching and trainingSales0%63 of 1240%1under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%
Sales enablement and contentSales0%38 of 810%1under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bitrix24 yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bitrix24 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast12115
Mistral Small04105
DeepSeek V4 Flash00213
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained31 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Bitrix24 or HubSpot free for zero-risk testing” Grok 4.1 Fast · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“Bitrix24 if you want completely free CPQ functionality” Kimi K2 · CPQ · budget prompt · first choice
“Unlimited contacts, basic pipelines/routing, website forms. | Larger teams (3+ people) on zero budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative
“For completely free: Bitrix24 provides CPQ features at no cost, though with limitations.” Mistral Small · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“CRMs to Be Cautious Of... Bitrix24: Trustpilot/Capterra lows (2.4/5 avg.); "terrible support"” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Cluttered, overwhelming interface; steep learning curve; poor/weak support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bitrix24, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bitrix24 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zoho CRM25 of 425Not in the top three
HubSpot CRM22 of 424Not in the top three
Pipedrive17 of 420Not in the top three
Freshsales12 of 421Not in the top three
PandaDoc11 of 426Not in the top three
QuoteWerks11 of 423Not in the top three
Salesforce Sales Cloud11 of 422Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales8 of 424Not in the top three
EngageBay7 of 420Not in the top three
HubSpot Commerce Hub6 of 420Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bitrix24. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 42 answers that named Bitrix24 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

croclub.com3
aktivsoftware.com2
articsledge.com2
ascendix.com2
bitrix24.comYour site2
capterra.com2
gokickflip.com2
guideflow.com2
qobra.co2
reddit.com2

Nineteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Bitrix24 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Bitrix24.
Website
bitrix24.com
Headquarters
Russia
Founded
2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bitrix24's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bitrix24, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bitrix24.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack