Every category where a model named Channelscaler for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	12%	2 of 108	21%	29	accepted challenger
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	2%	8 of 50	16%	38	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Channelscaler yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Channelscaler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	1	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	2	1	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	1	2	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	2	0	5
Mistral Small	0	5	0	1	6
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	5	3	3	11
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	3	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	3	1	1	7
Kimi K2	2	4	0	3	9
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	3	1	6
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels4

Paraphrase19 labels2

Comparative36 labelsNone

Budget-constrained16 labels4

Scale-constrained19 labels2

Negative28 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative145 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: High partner adoption and rapid deployment... Implementation takes weeks rather than months, and pricing is highly competitive for mid-market budgets” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · first choice

“Allbound (now ChannelScaler) | Quick wins, co-selling + marketing | 4.5-4.6/5 | $20K-$40K/year | Intuitive UX, unlimited users, co-branding, incentives/MDF” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · direct prompt · first choice

“Channeltivity or Allbound are frequently recommended due to their balance of features, usability, and price.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PRM · direct prompt · first choice

“Channelscaler (previously Allbound) - a good option for mid-market teams that want structured enablement.” Llama 4 Maverick · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“deeper configuration changes and complex logic mapping often require backend developer work” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Channelscaler ($50K+/year) are excellent but completely unsuitable for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · hard negative

“## Platforms to AVOID ### 1. Channelscaler Major Red Flags:” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Allbound / ZINFI — Solid but often priced at enterprise levels” Kimi K2 · PRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Channelscaler, over the 142 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Channelscaler was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner88 of 14216Not in the top three

Unifyr72 of 1428Compare →

Salesforce PRM69 of 1424Not in the top three

ZINFI65 of 1426Not in the top three

PartnerStack63 of 1426Not in the top three

Channeltivity61 of 1429Not in the top three

Kiflo46 of 14210Not in the top three

JourneyBee39 of 14211Compare →

Mindmatrix34 of 1420Not in the top three

Impartner PRM33 of 14211Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Channelscaler. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 142 answers that named Channelscaler and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

monday.com10

g2.com9

zinfi.com8

gartner.com7

partnerportal.io7

guideflow.com6

journeybee.io6

sourceforge.net6

channelinsider.com5

improvado.io5

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Channelscaler came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/prm-software9

guideflow.com/blog/best-prm-software6

channelinsider.com/channel-business/helpdesk-itsm-and-other-tools/prm-software5

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software5

partnerportal.io/partner-relationship-management-platforms5

technologyadvice.com/blog/marketing/best-channel-marketing-software5

zinfi.com/blog/partner-relationship-management-software-20265

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Channelscaler

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Channelscaler; a claim can dispute any of them.

Allbound 35Allbound (now Channelscaler) 5Channelscaler (formerly Allbound) 3Allbound (now ChannelScaler) 2Allbound (Recently Rebranded as ChannelScaler) 1Allbound / ChannelScaler 1Allbound/ChannelScaler 1Allbound/Channelscaler 1ChannelScaler (formerly Allbound) 1Channelscaler (Allbound + Channel Mechanics) 1Channelscaler (Formerly Allbound) 1Channelscaler (previously Allbound) 1Channelscaler/Allbound 1

The company

Channelscaler.

Website: channelscaler.com
Headquarters: San Mateo, United States
Founded: 2010

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Channelscaler's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Channelscaler, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at channelscaler.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.