| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 2% | 11 of 61 | 37% | 43 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 106 of 124 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 11 of 61 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 93 → 106 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“my default recommendation would be Salesforce Partner Cloud / Salesforce PRM if you already use Salesforce” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for CRM integration — if you're a Salesforce shop, there's no better fit” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Already on Salesforce? Start with Salesforce Partner Cloud.” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“For companies already deeply invested in Salesforce, Salesforce PRM provides the most seamless experience.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“"Avoid if: You are a startup or mid-market company looking for a portal you can spin up and manage yourself within a few weeks."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid for Mid-Market - Salesforce Partner Cloud (PRM) — Powerful but notoriously expensive and complex” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · direct prompt · hard negative
“Salesforce PRM is known for high total cost of ownership due to licensing fees, implementation costs, and ongoing customization requirements, plus a steep learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with Salesforce Partner Cloud if you need fast setup and simple admin, because G2 reviewers note that initial setup and customization can be complex.” Perplexity Sonar · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 158 of the 160 answers that named Salesforce PRM and are not a share of its labels.
624 of the 624 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce PRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce PRM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/partners, salesforce.com/sales/partner-cloud, salesforce.com/high-tech/prm-software, salesforce.com/partners/become-a-partner, salesforce.com/sales/distribution-channels. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce PRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce PRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce PRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: