| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 4% | 8 of 61 | 4% | 26 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 3% | 9 of 124 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 30 of 112 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referrals | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 30 of 112 |
| Channel marketing | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 9 of 124 |
| PRM | 4% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 8 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A PRM built for small to medium-sized businesses launching or scaling their first partner program... exceptionally easy to set up and use” Llama 4 Maverick · PRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you have $0/month to start: Go with PartnerPortal or Kiflo for a basic partner portal.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Partner Marketing Tool: Kiflo ... Designed specifically for SMBs and mid-market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“noted as the best choice for mid-market companies seeking quick ROI” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PRM · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 reviewers have flagged integration and automation gaps; test your actual CRM sync, commission rules, and account setup” GPT-6 Luna · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 128 of the 128 answers that named Kiflo PRM and are not a share of its labels.
487 of the 540 domain citations in answers naming Kiflo PRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 286 | 9 | 2026-09-17 | PRM, CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 162 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | PRM, CRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 26 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 24 | 2 | 2026-08-11 | PRM, CRM | |
| Case study | 23 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2025-09-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page kiflo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Kiflo PRM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: kiflo.com, kiflo.com, kiflo.com/pricing, trust.kiflo.com, kiflo.com/product/co-selling. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kiflo PRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kiflo PRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kiflo PRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: