GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › PartnerPortal.io · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Ranked

PartnerPortal.io

95Judge labels

34First choices

2Negative labels

12 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Best standing

47% in PRM for small business buyers

Rank 2 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger

0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 26 labels there were negative.

By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.

Small business1 of 60

under the label threshold

In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PartnerPortal.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	24%	2 of 50	0%	26	accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	4%	10 of 108	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Referral and partner programs	Partner and channel	0%	30 of 107	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PartnerPortal.io yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PartnerPortal.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	2	5
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	2	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2	0	4
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct14 labels7

Paraphrase22 labels4

Comparative18 labels9not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels22

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative12 labels6not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative95 labels in all, every segment counted; 34 of the 49 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“PartnerPortal is widely considered the best overall value for low-budget teams because it offers a robust feature set at a predictable, low flat rate.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“For the absolute best value on a limited budget, PartnerPortal.io is your best choice with its free tier and low starting price.” Mistral Small · PRM · budget prompt · first choice

“For the most budget-conscious company, I'd start with PartnerPortal.io at $249/month since it offers unlimited partners” MiniMax M2.5 · PRM · budget prompt · first choice

“PartnerPortal.io stands out as the best Partner Relationship Management (PRM) platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · PRM · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PartnerPortal.io, over the 95 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PartnerPortal.io was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kiflo75 of 9514Not in the top three

PartnerStack59 of 954Not in the top three

Impartner44 of 952Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM43 of 950Not in the top three

JourneyBee40 of 953Compare →

Channeltivity33 of 953Compare →

Channelscaler30 of 950Not in the top three

ZINFI28 of 951Not in the top three

Unifyr23 of 952Not in the top three

Pipedrive22 of 950Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PartnerPortal.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 95 answers that named PartnerPortal.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com7

partnerportal.ioYour site7

g2.com6

monday.com6

journeybee.io5

channelinsider.com4

gartner.com4

guideflow.com4

partnerfleet.io4

partnerplace.io4

Forty-four of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming PartnerPortal.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-prm-software7

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/prm-software6

channelinsider.com/channel-business/helpdesk-itsm-and-other-tools/prm-software4

g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-most-recommended-partner-relationship-management-software4

gartner.com/reviews/market/partner-relationship-management-applications4

partnerfleet.io/blog/best-prm-tools-for-your-partner-program4

partnerplace.io/knowledge-base/what-are-the-best-prm-software-solutions-out-there-20264

partnerportal.io/best-prm-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as PartnerPortal.io

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PartnerPortal.io; a claim can dispute any of them.

PartnerPortal 9

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PartnerPortal.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PartnerPortal.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at partnerportal.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.