Small business▼−14Since September 2026: 47% → 33%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
33%from 47% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 1 of 67, unchanged
2 categories · RankedPartnerPortal.io
78Judge labels
33First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
34% in PRM for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PartnerPortal.io →By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
Small business1 of 69
34%42 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market1 of 61
22%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise60 of 60
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PartnerPortal.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 22% | 1 of 61 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 3% | 12 of 124 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PartnerPortal.io held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PRM · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 24% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 2 → 1 of 59
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 45 → 53 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM | 24% | 20% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 61 |
| Channel marketing | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 12 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PartnerPortal.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PartnerPortal.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels2
Paraphrase8 labels3
Comparative12 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained32 labels27
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative13 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative78 labels in all, every segment counted; 33 of the 40 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best partner relationship management platform for a company with a limited budget is PartnerPortal.io, which offers a free plan and pricing starting at $599 per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · PRM · budget prompt · first choice
“PartnerPortal.io stands out as the best partner relationship management (PRM) platform for companies with a limited budget” Mistral Small · PRM · budget prompt · first choice
“PartnerPortal.io stands out as the best partner relationship management (PRM) platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · PRM · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want to spend $0 right now: Go with PartnerPortal.io (best if you have under 5 partners and need CRM sync)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“both popular but come with notable limitations around customization, payments, and flexibility” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PartnerPortal.io, over the 78 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PartnerPortal.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PartnerPortal.io, over the 78 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PartnerPortal.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PartnerPortal.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 78 of the 78 answers that named PartnerPortal.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
partnerportal.ioYour site64
g2.com51
pipedrive.com49
guideflow.com41
folk.app32
kiflo.com30
partnerfleet.io30
zinfi.com30
channelinsider.com28
learn.g2.com27
318 of the 382 domain citations in answers naming PartnerPortal.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where PartnerPortal.io stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where PartnerPortal.io stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“partnerportal.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,437 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 188 · 9 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 349
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
22%
rank 1 of 61 in PRM
First choices
33
across its categories
- Named in
- 78 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 78 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on partnerportal.io
174
subdomains included
Content
59
counted in the table below
Documentation
69
Product · Integration
7 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 43 | 4 | 2026-09-06 | PRM, CRM | |
| Blog | 7 | 7 | 2026-09-24 | PRM | |
| Case study | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | CRM, PRM | |
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Best prm for hubspot blog
- 2026-09-24Best prm for salesforce blog
- 2026-09-24Prm vs crm comparison
- 2026-09-23What is partner management glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-08What is a partner portal glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-06Partner portal updates ai assistant xero reseller and more news or press
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page partnerportal.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as PartnerPortal.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PartnerPortal.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
PartnerPortal 5Kiflo / PartnerPortal 1
Follow PartnerPortal.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PartnerPortal.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PartnerPortal.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Partner Portal & PRM Software
- For
- SMB and mid-market teams running referral, reseller, affiliate, or channel programs
- Price stated
- one free plan and two paid plans, priced on the number of partners and leads you manage — no per-seat fees and no paid add-ons partnerportal.io
- Starting price
- 0 partnerportal.io
- Free plan or trial
- Free plan available — a genuinely free tier, not a time-limited trial partnerportal.io
- Integrations claimed
- 12 partnerportal.io/pricing
- Certifications
- SSL securedGDPR & CCPA compliantSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001
- Hosting
- United StatesAWS us-east-1 (N. Virginia)MongoDB Atlas on AWS us-east-1 (N. Virginia)
- Customers named
- SkioGovaloCrossbeamFlipCXAnecdotesSearchspringCohleyFlip CX
What PartnerPortal.io's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: partnerportal.io, partnerportal.io/pricing, partnerportal.io/security, partnerportal.io/features/metrics, partnerportal.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PartnerPortal.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PartnerPortal.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PartnerPortal.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PartnerPortal.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PartnerPortal.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where PartnerPortal.io is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where PartnerPortal.io is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend PartnerPortal.io first in Partner relationship management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.