Every category where a model named ZINFI Unified Partner Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	19 of 50	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	27 of 108	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZINFI Unified Partner Management yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZINFI Unified Partner Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase6 labels1

Comparative17 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels2

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise reseller/channel program with a big budget? → Impartner or ZINFI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · comparative prompt · first choice

“30-day full-access trial (no card needed) covers TCMA like localized campaigns... Ideal for testing comprehensive features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose ZINFI UPM if you have a more complex, multi-tier distribution network” MiniMax M2.5 · Channel marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“Differentiation: Modular enterprise solution with comprehensive feature set” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Slow performance is the most repeated complaint ... Higher cost compared to other solutions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

“Complex pricing structure that can become expensive” Mistral Small · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZINFI Unified Partner Management, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZINFI Unified Partner Management was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Impartner PRM22 of 3810Not in the top three

PartnerStack21 of 383Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM21 of 382Not in the top three

Unifyr20 of 385Not in the top three

Channeltivity18 of 381Not in the top three

Channelscaler14 of 380Not in the top three

impact.com12 of 383Not in the top three

Kiflo10 of 380Not in the top three

Mindmatrix10 of 380Not in the top three

JourneyBee9 of 383Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZINFI Unified Partner Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 38 answers that named ZINFI Unified Partner Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

articsledge.com1

channelinsider.com1

channeltivity.com1

gartner.com1

guideflow.com1

help.salesforce.com1

improvado.io1

journeybee.io1

learn.g2.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming ZINFI Unified Partner Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/partner-relationship-management-prm2

g2.com/categories/partner-relationship-management-prm/enterprise2

articsledge.com/post/partner-relationship-management-prm-software1

channelinsider.com/channel-business/helpdesk-itsm-and-other-tools/prm-software1

channeltivity.com/partner-relationship-management1

g2.com/categories/partner-management/small-business1

g2.com/categories/partner-relationship-management-prm/small-business1

g2.com/discussions/best-partner-relationship-management-software-for-small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ZINFI Unified Partner Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ZINFI Unified Partner Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

ZINFI Unified Partner Management (UPM) 6

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZINFI Unified Partner Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZINFI Unified Partner Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zinfi.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.