AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Mindmatrix · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Mindmatrix

77Judge labels
12First choices
12Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Channel marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 23 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Mindmatrix →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mindmatrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel10%2 of 12422%23accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Partner relationship managementPartner and channel0%16 of 610%7under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Mindmatrix held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Channel marketing · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 11 → 15 of 123
Mid-market▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 11 → 2 of 120
Enterprise▲+9Since September 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 19 → 4 of 77

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Channel marketing2%12%▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 2 of 124
PRM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 38 → 16 of 61

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Mindmatrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash23016
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash10012
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.502114
GPT-6 Luna01012
Muse Glimmer 30B01405

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels6
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative25 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels4
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mindmatrix: Best All-in-One "Partner Operating System"... highly favored in the mid-market because it consolidates PRM... TCMA... into a single platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · first choice
“Mindmatrix is the standout choice. It delivers the most complete TCMA functionality at an SMB-friendly price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“PRM platforms like Mindmatrix and PartnerFleet are highly recommended for mid-market and enterprise teams” Mistral Small · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mindmatrix is the safest recommendation because it's explicitly aimed at mid-market” GPT-5.4 mini · Channel marketing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Mindmatrix (PRM / TCM) ... Difficult setup and slow implementation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“often flag a steep learning curve, slow load times when rendering digital marketing assets, and a clunky mobile interface” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“These specialized platforms typically target mid-market to enterprise companies... Mindmatrix (From $499/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · soft negative
“don't publish pricing and require custom quotes, often starting in the hundreds or thousands per month” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindmatrix, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindmatrix was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SproutLoud21 of 772Not among the top eight
Ansira19 of 777Not among the top eight
Channeltivity16 of 774Not among the top eight
Salesforce PRM15 of 771Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindmatrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 77 answers that named Mindmatrix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com50
journeybee.io29
zinfi.com29
guideflow.com28
technologyadvice.com28
introw.io25
improvado.io20
monday.com19
impartner.com17
learn.g2.com17

262 of the 262 domain citations in answers naming Mindmatrix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mindmatrix.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mindmatrix takes 10% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“mindmatrix”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
5 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,681 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,673 · 60 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,403
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as Khera Harbinder Singh, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 4 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
10%
rank 2 of 124 in channel marketing
Segment leader
10%
Channelscaler
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
77 answers
Its own site cited
in 76 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on mindmatrix.net
1,153
subdomains included
Content
645
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog591undatedPRM, CRM
Webinar or virtual event2102025-10-24PRM
Case study1102018-06-05PRM
Conference or event902023-06-06PRM, Direct mail
Glossary or explainer502025-02-06PRM, CRM
Comparison412026-07-29PRM
Report or ebook302020-07-03PRM
Template or tool102020-02-25
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mindmatrix.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Mindmatrix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mindmatrix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mindmatrix (Bridge) 2MindMatrix 1

Follow Mindmatrix

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mindmatrix is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-Powered Partner Marketing, PRM & Channel Sales Enablement Platform
For
Partnership Leaders
Price stated
$$ mindmatrix.net
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Mindmatrix's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mindmatrix.net. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindmatrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindmatrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindmatrix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Mindmatrix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindmatrix, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mindmatrix.net is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Mindmatrix is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Mindmatrix is among the products AI models recommend first in Channel partner and local marketing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/partner/channel-partner-and-local-marketing/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/mindmatrix--channel-partner-and-local-marketing-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Channel partner and local marketing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/partner/channel-partner-and-local-marketing/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/mindmatrix--channel-partner-and-local-marketing-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Channel partner and local marketing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/partner/channel-partner-and-local-marketing/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/mindmatrix--channel-partner-and-local-marketing-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Channel partner and local marketing, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Channel partner and local marketing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.