Every category where a model named Mindmatrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	2%	11 of 108	16%	19	accepted challenger
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	44 of 50	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mindmatrix yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mindmatrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	1	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative27 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Comprehensive through-channel marketing automation (TCMA) and highly localized campaign execution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Value: Mindmatrix ... gives you a meaningful TCMA capability without jumping to enterprise-scale costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · alternative

“The unified Partner Operating System combining PRM, TCMA, and Direct Sales Enablement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Unified PRM/TCMA, content automation; broad coverage for mid-market growth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“TCMA module is often described as "the weakest leg"” Kimi K2 · Channel marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“the comparison notes complex setup and less CRM-native collaboration, which may be a drawback for lean teams” Perplexity Sonar · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

“without enterprise-level costs (typically $1,500–$5,000+/month for options like ... Mindmatrix)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · budget prompt · soft negative

“a common user complaint centers on the platform's UI/UX, especially on mobile devices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindmatrix, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindmatrix was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Unifyr52 of 638Not in the top three

Impartner40 of 6310Not in the top three

Channelscaler34 of 633Not in the top three

ZINFI33 of 632Not in the top three

Channeltivity26 of 632Not in the top three

Ansira20 of 636Not in the top three

JourneyBee18 of 635Not in the top three

Salesforce PRM15 of 630Not in the top three

PartnerStack14 of 630Not in the top three

Impartner PRM11 of 636Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindmatrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 63 answers that named Mindmatrix and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com8

improvado.io4

sourceforge.net4

technologyadvice.com4

extu.com3

forecastable.com3

gartner.com3

insiderone.com3

introw.io3

journeybee.io3

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Mindmatrix came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing4

improvado.io/blog/cross-channel-marketing-platforms4

technologyadvice.com/blog/marketing/best-channel-marketing-software4

extu.com/blog/through-channel-marketing-software-comparison3

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing/small-business3

improvado.io/blog/top-enterprise-marketing-platforms3

insiderone.com/best-omnichannel-marketing-platforms-enterprises3

partnerportal.io/partner-relationship-management-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mindmatrix

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mindmatrix; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mindmatrix (Bridge 5.0) 1Mindmatrix (Bridge PRM) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindmatrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindmatrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mindmatrix.net is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.