GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › SproutLoud · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SproutLoud

22Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Channel marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 26 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SproutLoud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%26 of 10814%7under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SproutLoud yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SproutLoud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Forrester Strong Performer; G2 Implementation/Usability Leader. 40+ tactics for local B2B/B2C” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“SproutLoud and BrandMuscle leading the local/distributed marketing end of the market” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Alternative "Partner-Funded" Model: SproutLoud” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“The brand-to-local, "Do-It-For-Me" execution leader.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users report that the platform's cost can be prohibitive for mid-market budgets and that the admin portal can sometimes suffer from a difficult learning curve” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SproutLoud, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SproutLoud was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Unifyr20 of 224Not in the top three
Impartner15 of 223Not in the top three
Ansira12 of 223Not in the top three
Mindmatrix10 of 220Not in the top three
ZINFI9 of 223Not in the top three
Channelscaler7 of 221Not in the top three
xAmplify6 of 222Not in the top three
BrandMuscle6 of 220Not in the top three
Channeltivity5 of 222Not in the top three
Kiflo4 of 220Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SproutLoud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 22 answers that named SproutLoud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forrester.com1

One of the one domain citations in answers naming SproutLoud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SproutLoud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SproutLoud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sproutloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack