| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 18% | 3 of 50 | 0% | 22 | accepted challenger |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 15% | 1 of 108 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 4% | 9 of 107 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Journeybee if your main need is a partner marketing / PRM tool, because it is explicitly positioned as the best PRM for mid-market B2B companies” Perplexity Sonar · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“🥇 Top Pick: Journeybee ... Why it wins: Journeybee combines PRM, TCMA, and multi-tier distributor management in one platform at a mid-market price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · first choice
“my top recommendation is Journeybee if you want a modern PRM with fast deployment, strong automation, and mid-market fit” Perplexity Sonar · PRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Journeybee — Best Overall All-in-One for SMBs ... offers the best value-to-features ratio if you can stretch to ~$500/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 94 answers that named JourneyBee and are not a share of its labels.
Forty of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming JourneyBee came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JourneyBee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JourneyBee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at journeybee.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.